Integral in Gardiner's book on stochastic methods

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The integral discussed in Gardiner's "Handbook of Stochastic Methods" (third edition, section 3.7.3) involves the expression \sum_i\int d\vec x \frac{\partial}{\partial x_i}[-A_ip_1\log(p_1/p_2)], where p_1 and p_2 are solutions to the Chapman-Kolmogorov equation. The proof requires demonstrating that p_1\log(p_1/p_2) vanishes at infinity, leveraging the properties of stationary distributions. The Gauss theorem is applied to transform the integral into a surface term, which is critical for concluding the proof. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the behavior of these distributions at infinity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Chapman-Kolmogorov equation
  • Familiarity with the Gauss theorem in vector calculus
  • Knowledge of stationary distributions in stochastic processes
  • Experience with Markov processes and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of stationary distributions in stochastic processes
  • Learn about the application of the Gauss theorem in higher dimensions
  • Explore the Chapman-Kolmogorov equation in detail
  • Investigate the implications of boundary conditions in stochastic integrals
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and researchers working with stochastic processes, particularly those focusing on Markov processes and their applications in statistical mechanics.

eoghan
Messages
201
Reaction score
7
Dear all,
I have troubles in one proof of the book Handbook of stochastic methods by Gardiner. In the paragraph 3.7.3 he writes this integral
[itex]\sum_i\int d\vec x \frac{\partial}{\partial x_i}[-A_ip_1\log(p_1/p_2)][/itex]
where [itex]p_1[/itex] and [itex]p_2[/itex] are two solutions of the Chapman-Kolmogorov equation and [itex]\vec A[/itex] is a function of [itex]\vec x[/itex]. Then Gardiner says, suppose that we take [itex]p_2[/itex] as a stationary distribution [itex]p_s(\vec x)[/itex] which is nonzero everywhere, except at infinity, where it and its first derivative vanish. The integral can be integrated to give surface terms which vanish at infinity.
I don't know how to prove this! I used the Gauss theorem to obtain:
[itex]\sum_i\int_D d\vec x \frac{\partial}{\partial x_i}[-A_ip_1\log(p_1/p_2)]=<br /> -\int_{D} d\vec x \nabla[\vec A p_1\log(p_1/p_2)]=<br /> -\int_{\partial D} dS \:\:\hat n\cdot[\vec A p_1\log(p_1/p_2)][/itex]

and this is a surface term, where the surface extends to infinity. Now I should conclude that [itex]p_1\log(p_1/p_2)[/itex] is zero at infinity, but I don't know how to proof that. I mean, I only know that [itex]p_2[/itex] is zero at infinity and this would make the integral to diverge! Maybe I can say that since [itex]p_1[/itex] it's solution to the Chapman-Kolmogorov equation, it is itself a distribution and so also [itex]p_1[/itex] vanishes at infinity, but I'm not sure about this.
 
eoghan said:
Dear all,
I have troubles in one proof of the book Handbook of stochastic methods by Gardiner.

Not that I can answer your question, but which edition of Handbook of Stochastic Methods is involved? There is a "section" 3.7.3 in the second edition, but I don't see the equation you mention.
 
Stephen Tashi said:
Not that I can answer your question, but which edition of Handbook of Stochastic Methods is involved? There is a "section" 3.7.3 in the second edition, but I don't see the equation you mention.
Hi Stephen!
The book is the third edition. Chapter 3 = Markov Processes, section 3.7=Stationary and Homogeneous Markov Processes, subsection 3.7.3=Approach to a Stationary Process
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K