Integral inconsistency with variable change

In summary, there is a hidden danger in treating differentials as actual variables to manipulate. The substitution w = x + y is only valid when either x or y is a constant. In the case where one is a constant, the differential can be absorbed into the integration constant. However, in complex analysis, the substitution and differential manipulation is valid due to the nature of imaginary numbers and the specified path of the integral. In the given example, both integrals can be shown to be equivalent by manipulating the differentials and using the relationship dw = dx + dy.
  • #1
matt_crouch
161
1
so

## \int wdw = \frac{1}{2}w^{2} ##

now if w=x+y,

## \int (x+y)(dx+dw)= \int xdx + \int ydx + \int xdy + \int ydy ##

which can be evaluated and gives

##\int(x+y)(dx+dy)=\frac{1}{2}x^{2}+2xy+\frac{1}{2}y^{2}##

but

##\frac{1}{2}x^{2}+2xy+\frac{1}{2}y^{2} \neq \frac{1}{2}w^{2}##

can someone explain why?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes FactChecker
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
There's a hidden danger behind treating differentials as actual variable to manipulate, and so it should be generally avoided except in cases in which one knows why what they're doing is mathematically sound.
 
  • #3
You are turning a standard integral into a double integral without any justification. Your substitution w = x + y is valid when either x or y is a constant. Thus, assuming y to be a constant, [itex]dw = dx [/itex] and the integral becomes [itex]\int(x+y)dx=\frac{x^{2}}{2}+yx+C [/itex]. Furthermore, [itex] \frac{1}{2}w^{2}=\frac{1}{2}(x+y)^{2}=\frac{1}{2}x^{2}+\frac{2}{2}xy+\frac{1}{2}y^{2}[/itex]. Since y is constant, you can absorb the y2 part into the integration constant C.
 
  • Like
Likes matt_crouch
  • #4
Svein said:
You are turning a standard integral into a double integral without any justification. Your substitution w = x + y is valid when either x or y is a constant. Thus, assuming y to be a constant, [itex]dw = dx [/itex] and the integral becomes [itex]\int(x+y)dx=\frac{x^{2}}{2}+yx+C [/itex]. Furthermore, [itex] \frac{1}{2}w^{2}=\frac{1}{2}(x+y)^{2}=\frac{1}{2}x^{2}+\frac{2}{2}xy+\frac{1}{2}y^{2}[/itex]. Since y is constant, you can absorb the y2 part into the integration constant C.

However you can do the substitution for example in complex analysis where ##u=x+iy## and ##v=x-iy## with the differentials becoming ##du=dx+idy## and ##dv=dx-idy##, Is this substitution and hence the differentials valid because of the imaginary numbers? and hence when you integrate you can separate real and imaginary parts?
 
  • #5
matt_crouch said:
However you can do the substitution for example in complex analysis where u=x+iyu=x+iy and v=xiyv=x-iy with the differentials becoming du=dx+idydu=dx+idy and dv=dxidydv=dx-idy, Is this substitution and hence the differentials valid because of the imaginary numbers? and hence when you integrate you can separate real and imaginary parts?
It is a bit more complicated than that.
A complex integral is always taken along a specified path, which means that instead of writing [itex]\int_{a}^{b}f(x)dx [/itex], you have to write [itex]\int_{\gamma}f(z)dz [/itex] in the complex case. Also [itex]\gamma=\gamma(t) [/itex], with t∈[0, 1] and [itex] \gamma(0)=a, \gamma(1)=b[/itex]. The implication is that complex integrals tend to end up as [itex]\int_{0}^{1}f(\gamma(t))\frac{d\gamma}{dt}dt [/itex] - which again is a one-dimensional integral.
 
  • #6
Svein said:
It is a bit more complicated than that.
A complex integral is always taken along a specified path, which means that instead of writing [itex]\int_{a}^{b}f(x)dx [/itex], you have to write [itex]\int_{\gamma}f(z)dz [/itex] in the complex case. Also [itex]\gamma=\gamma(t) [/itex], with t∈[0, 1] and [itex] \gamma(0)=a, \gamma(1)=b[/itex]. The implication is that complex integrals tend to end up as [itex]\int_{0}^{1}f(\gamma(t))\frac{d\gamma}{dt}dt [/itex] - which again is a one-dimensional integral.

Ok thanks for your response. With regard to the first integral in the first post, you actually can show that they are both equivalent,

##\int (x+y)(dx+dy)=\int xdx +\int xdy+ \int ydx +\int ydy##
from the relationship
##dw=dx+dy##
we also get
##dx=dw-dy##, ##dy=dw-dx##

if you substitute those into the cross variable terms

##\int xdx+\int ydy +\int x(dw-dx)+\int y(dw-dy)##,
##\int dx+ \int ydy +\int xdw -\int xdx -\int ydy +\int ydw##

This will simplify to

##\int (x+y)dw=\int wdw=\frac{1}{2}w^{2}##
 

1. What is meant by "integral inconsistency with variable change"?

"Integral inconsistency with variable change" refers to a situation in calculus where changing the variable of integration in an integral leads to a different result than the original integral. This can happen when the function being integrated is not continuous or when the limits of integration are not properly adjusted.

2. How do you identify integral inconsistency with variable change?

To identify integral inconsistency with variable change, you can first check for discontinuities in the function being integrated. You can also try graphing the function and the region of integration to see if there are any irregularities. Additionally, if the limits of integration are not properly adjusted when changing the variable, it can lead to inconsistency.

3. Why is integral inconsistency with variable change a problem?

Integral inconsistency with variable change can be a problem because it can lead to incorrect results. If the variable change is not handled properly, the integral may no longer accurately represent the original function being integrated. This can lead to errors in calculations and incorrect interpretations of data.

4. How can integral inconsistency with variable change be avoided?

To avoid integral inconsistency with variable change, it is important to carefully check for discontinuities in the function being integrated and to properly adjust the limits of integration when changing the variable. It may also be helpful to graph the function and the region of integration to ensure there are no irregularities.

5. Are there any benefits to using variable change in integrals?

Yes, there are benefits to using variable change in integrals. It can often simplify the integral and make it easier to solve. It can also help to reveal patterns or symmetries in the function being integrated, making it easier to interpret the results. However, it is important to handle variable change carefully to avoid integral inconsistency.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
299
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
905
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
905
Replies
2
Views
258
Back
Top