MHB Integral Notation of an exponential Brownian motion

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the integral notation of exponential Brownian motion as presented in Marc Yor's paper. The two notations, $$\int_0^t ds \exp(aB_s + bs)$$ and $$\int_0^t \exp(aB_s + bs) ds$$, are confirmed to be equivalent. Additionally, the scaling property of Brownian motion is highlighted, stating that if $B_s$ is a standard Brownian motion, then $\sqrt{c}B_{cs}$ retains the properties of standard Brownian motion. References to quantum mechanics texts are provided for further reading.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of stochastic calculus, particularly Brownian motion.
  • Familiarity with integral notation in mathematical contexts.
  • Basic knowledge of quantum mechanics and its mathematical frameworks.
  • Experience with exponential functions in probability theory.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Brownian motion, focusing on the scaling property.
  • Read "Modern Quantum Mechanics" by J. Sakurai for insights on notation in quantum contexts.
  • Explore the implications of stochastic integrals in financial mathematics.
  • Investigate the relationship between Brownian motion and other stochastic processes.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and financial analysts interested in stochastic processes, particularly those working with Brownian motion and its applications in quantum mechanics and finance.

gnob
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Good day!

I am reading the paper of Marc Yor (www.jstor.org/stable/1427477). equation (1.a) seems unfamiliar to me since the $ds$ comes first before the exponential part;
$$
\int_0^t ds \exp(aB_s + bs).
$$
Can you please help me clarify if there is a difference with the above notation as compared to if I write it this way:
$$
\int_0^t \exp(aB_s + bs) ds.
$$
Please give me some reference (books) on this. thanks

Secondly, how does the scaling property applied to (1.a) to become
$$
\int_0^t ds \exp 2(B_s + vs).
$$
Thanks a lot for your response. I know that the Brownian scaling states that if $B_s$ is a standard Brownian motion, then $\sqrt{c}B_{cs}$ is also a standard Brownian motion.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
gnob said:
Good day!

I am reading the paper of Marc Yor (www.jstor.org/stable/1427477). equation (1.a) seems unfamiliar to me since the $ds$ comes first before the exponential part;
$$
\int_0^t ds \exp(aB_s + bs).
$$
Can you please help me clarify if there is a difference with the above notation as compared to if I write it this way:
$$
\int_0^t \exp(aB_s + bs) ds.
$$
Please give me some reference (books) on this. thanks


Hi gnob, :)

Yes they do mean the same thing. I have seen this notation used in quantum mechanics books such as,

1) Modern Quantum Mechanics by J. Sakurai

2) Quantum Physics by S. Gasiorowicz

3) Quantum Mechanics by C.C. Tannoudji

Also a brief description about the two notations can be found >>here<<.

Kind Regards,
Sudharaka.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K