MHB Integral Notation of an exponential Brownian motion

gnob
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Good day!

I am reading the paper of Marc Yor (www.jstor.org/stable/1427477). equation (1.a) seems unfamiliar to me since the $ds$ comes first before the exponential part;
$$
\int_0^t ds \exp(aB_s + bs).
$$
Can you please help me clarify if there is a difference with the above notation as compared to if I write it this way:
$$
\int_0^t \exp(aB_s + bs) ds.
$$
Please give me some reference (books) on this. thanks

Secondly, how does the scaling property applied to (1.a) to become
$$
\int_0^t ds \exp 2(B_s + vs).
$$
Thanks a lot for your response. I know that the Brownian scaling states that if $B_s$ is a standard Brownian motion, then $\sqrt{c}B_{cs}$ is also a standard Brownian motion.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
gnob said:
Good day!

I am reading the paper of Marc Yor (www.jstor.org/stable/1427477). equation (1.a) seems unfamiliar to me since the $ds$ comes first before the exponential part;
$$
\int_0^t ds \exp(aB_s + bs).
$$
Can you please help me clarify if there is a difference with the above notation as compared to if I write it this way:
$$
\int_0^t \exp(aB_s + bs) ds.
$$
Please give me some reference (books) on this. thanks


Hi gnob, :)

Yes they do mean the same thing. I have seen this notation used in quantum mechanics books such as,

1) Modern Quantum Mechanics by J. Sakurai

2) Quantum Physics by S. Gasiorowicz

3) Quantum Mechanics by C.C. Tannoudji

Also a brief description about the two notations can be found >>here<<.

Kind Regards,
Sudharaka.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top