MHB Integral of sine = 27/2+ln^2(2)+ln(2)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tony1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral Sine
Tony1
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
How to prove this integral,

$$\int_{0}^{2\pi}\sin\left({x\over 2}\right)\ln^2\left[\sin\left({x\over 4}\right)\sin\left({x\over 8}\right)\right]={27\over 2}+\ln^2(2)+\ln(2)$$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Tony said:
How to prove this integral,

$$\int_{0}^{2\pi}\sin\left({x\over 2}\right)\ln^2\left[\sin\left({x\over 4}\right)\sin\left({x\over 8}\right)\right]={27\over 2}+\ln^2(2)+\ln(2)$$
Where are you getting these monstrosities from?

-Dan
 
Hi Tony and welcome to MHB! :D

Why are you posting these problems? Also, do you have the solutions?

I am considering moving them to the "Challenge Questions an Puzzles" forum and I can mark them as "Unsolved Challenges" if you do not have solutions.

Also, I encourage you to give more meaningful titles to your threads - I will be renaming several of them in the near future.

Good evening,

greg1313
 
greg1313 said:
Hi Tony and welcome to MHB! :D

Why are you posting these problems? Also, do you have the solutions?

I am considering moving them to the "Challenge Questions an Puzzles" forum and I can mark them as "Unsolved Challenges" if you do not have solutions.

Also, I encourage you to give more meaningful titles to your threads - I will be renaming several of them in the near future.

Good evening,

greg1313

Hi greg1313,

No, I have no solution for them, that why I am posting them for a solution.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top