Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Integral over a set of measure 0

  1. Sep 20, 2010 #1
    Is the integral over a set of measure zero always equals to zero? Can the integral be undefined?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 20, 2010 #2

    mathman

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    It may be undefined if the function itself is peculiar with infinity as its value. For ordinary functions the integral will be 0.
     
    Last edited: Sep 20, 2010
  4. Sep 20, 2010 #3
    Sorry, I have the question that, if Lebesgue integration, they always define the convention [tex] \infty \cdot 0 = 0 [/tex], so, in this case, even the function takes [tex] \infty [/tex] in a set of measure 0, the integral is still 0?
     
  5. Sep 21, 2010 #4

    mathman

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Convention is an easy way out.
     
  6. Sep 21, 2010 #5

    Hurkyl

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    For Lebesgue integration, that the integral over a set of measure zero is a rather trivial theorem, following from the fact that all simple functions have integral zero -- so via (what I believe is) the usual formulation, it doesn't even need to be treated as a special case.


    Riemann integration assumes the function is real-valued, so it doesn't even apply if you are considering extended-real-number-valued functions that take on the values [itex]+\infty[/itex] or [itex]-\infty[/itex].
     
    Last edited: Sep 21, 2010
  7. Sep 21, 2010 #6
    But apparently to me [tex] \infty \cdot 0 = 0 [/tex] should be adopted
    Else, if [tex] f [/tex] admit [tex] \infty [/tex] on set [tex] A [/tex] of measure [tex] 0 [/tex], we may use [tex] f_{n} = n [/tex] on [tex] A [/tex] to approximate [tex] f [/tex] from below, then, the integral of [tex] f_{n} [/tex] is zero, by monotone convergence theorem, the integral of [tex] f [/tex] should be zero as well. If we do not define [tex] \infty \cdot 0 = 0 [/tex], we may get inconsistency in this case?
     
  8. Sep 22, 2010 #7
    But what if the f_{n} are defined over sets of measure non-zero, but that the sum of the measure of those sets converges to zero?
     
    Last edited: Sep 22, 2010
  9. Sep 22, 2010 #8
    Sorry that I cannot get your idea exactly. Or can you tell me explicitly what is the function [tex] f [/tex] to be integrated?
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Integral over a set of measure 0
  1. Expectation over Sets (Replies: 8)

Loading...