Integral: square root of sum of trig polynomials

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The integral I = ∫₀²π √{(1 + ∑ₙ₌₁ᴺ αₙ e^{-inx})(1 + ∑ₙ₌₁ᴺ αₙ* e^{inx})} dx presents significant challenges due to the square root complicating the orthogonality of trigonometric polynomials. The discussion emphasizes that numerical methods are the most viable approach for evaluating this integral, as analytical methods may lead to complex difficulties. The user Nick is considering differentiating with respect to the coefficients αₙ, although this may not directly aid in solving the integral. Expanding the expression under the radical for potential cancellations is also suggested as a possible strategy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fourier series and coefficients
  • Familiarity with complex analysis and complex conjugates
  • Knowledge of numerical integration techniques
  • Basic principles of Lagrangian mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore numerical integration methods such as Simpson's rule or Gaussian quadrature
  • Research Fourier series expansions and their properties
  • Study complex analysis techniques relevant to integrals involving complex coefficients
  • Investigate the application of perturbation methods in Lagrangian mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers dealing with complex integrals, particularly those involving Fourier series and numerical methods for integration.

nickthequick
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am trying to make progress on the following integral

I = \int_0^{2\pi} \sqrt{(1+\sum_{n=1}^N \alpha_n e^{-inx})(1+\sum_{n=1}^N \alpha_n^* e^{inx})} \ dx

where * denotes complex conjugate and the Fourier coefficients \alpha_n are constant complex coefficients, and unspecified. The square root throws off the ability to manipulate the orthogonality of the trig polynomials and I have been struggling to find a way to approach this problem without putting asymptotic bounds on the coefficients, which I do not want to do at this point.

Does anyone have any suggestions for how to attack this?

Thanks,

Nick
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Definitely numerically. You try it analytically, you'll wind up in an asylum somewhere.
 
Hm. I suspected as much. I'm going to end up differentiating this term w.r.t \alpha_n as it is part of the potential term in a Lagrangian. I don't see how that would help solve this, but I note it for completeness.
 
If the an are unspecified, then numerical integration would also appear to be out the window as well.
The only other course is to expand the expression under the radical and hope for spit-load of cancellations.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K