Integral Substitution: Evaluating Int f(x4) dx

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter squenshl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral Substitution
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around evaluating the integral \(\int_a^b f(x^4) dx\) using the substitution \(u = x^4\). Participants explore different methods for integration, the implications of the choice of function \(f\), and the potential for using substitution in various contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose using the substitution \(u = x^4\) and adjusting the limits accordingly, while others question the necessity of this method for the given integral.
  • One participant suggests that the integral can be simplified using the power rule for integration, indicating a more straightforward approach.
  • Another participant expresses interest in exploring the substitution method despite its complexity, suggesting it may enhance understanding of integration techniques.
  • There is a discussion about the importance of evaluating integrals using various methods, with some arguing that trying different approaches can be beneficial for learning.
  • Participants note the need to consider limits when performing the substitution, highlighting an area of potential confusion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best method for evaluating the integral. Some advocate for the substitution approach, while others emphasize the simplicity of using the power rule. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the efficiency and appropriateness of different integration methods.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of clarity on the function \(f\) and the specific context in which the substitution method is being applied. Participants also note the importance of considering limits in the evaluation process.

squenshl
Messages
468
Reaction score
4
How do I evaluate the integral [tex]\int_a^b[/tex] f(x4) dx = [tex]\int_y^z[/tex] f(u) dx/du du, where u=x4
y=a4
z=b4
 
Physics news on Phys.org
squenshl said:
How do I evaluate the integral [tex]\int_a^b[/tex] f(x4) dx = [tex]\int_y^z[/tex] f(u) dx/du du, where u=x4
y=a4
z=b4

How you integrate the function f depends strongly on what f is, don't you think?
 
f is [tex]\int_-1^1[/tex] 1+x4 dx
 
f is [tex]\int_1^1[/tex] 1+x4 dx
meant to be a -1 at the bottom of the integral.
How could I do this then.
 
Well, if your integral is simply

[tex]\int_{-1}^1 1 + x^4\, dx[/tex]

Then it's pretty simple. Just separate the integrand so that,

[tex]\int_{-1}^1 \,dx + \int_{-1}^1 x^4 \, dx[/tex]

But, based on the context of the question I'm not sure that's what you're looking for. Perhaps you could repost exactly what you mean clearly?
 
Sure. Consider the integral [tex]\int_{-1}^1[/tex] 1+x4 dx
How do I evaluate this integral using the substitution u=x4 and the formula:
[tex]\int_a^b[/tex] f(x4) dx = [tex]\int_{a^4}^{b^4}[/tex] f(u) dx/du du, where u=x4
 
Why would you use that method to evaluate the integral? The integral you have posted can easily be evaluated using the power rule for integration.
 
I thought this was a more interesting way but just don't know how to get started.
 
Also I someone could help me with this problem.
How could I evaluate the integral above using u=x4, but seperating it into 2 integrals.
 
  • #10
Taking detours isn't a more interesting way, but here goes.
[itex]u=x^4 \Rightarrow du=4x^3dx[/itex]

[tex] \int 1+x^4 dx=\int \frac{1+u}{4(u^{3/4})} du[/tex]

Making life a lot harder!
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Personally I wouldn't discourage him, I find it a good way to learn how to compute integrals and what methods to use can be supplemented by trying other methods that come to mind, and seeing why they may not be as efficient. Once he computes that integral Cyosis got him, I think he will be able to see in future why it may not be wise to compute an integral as such.
 
  • #12
You raise a very good point. I guess it's all too easy to see if something is going to be inefficient or not when you have some experience with the topic at hand.

Note: I didn't take the limits into account so you still have to do that yourself.
 
  • #13
jgens said:
Why would you use that method to evaluate the integral? The integral you have posted can easily be evaluated using the power rule for integration.

You are too harsh. Sure, for this function there are easy ways to do the integral. But for other functions f maybe you really should do the substitution. And why not learn to do the substitution on simple problems that can be evaluated in other ways? Then, for example, you can check your answers and see when you make a mistake.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K