Integral with Cutoff: Understand the Logarithmic Terms

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter LAHLH
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on evaluating the double integral \(\int^{L}_{0}\int^{L}_{0} \frac{dxdy}{(x-y)^2}\) with a cutoff parameter 'a' to manage divergence when \(x=y\). The result is established as \(2L/a - 2\ln{(L/a)} + \mathcal{O}(1)\), where 'a' represents lattice spacing. Participants emphasize the necessity of setting the integrand to zero when \(x-y PREREQUISITES

  • Understanding of double integrals in calculus
  • Familiarity with divergence in integrals
  • Knowledge of regularization techniques in mathematical physics
  • Basic concepts of lattice spacing in quantum field theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the regularization techniques in quantum field theory
  • Learn about Srednicki's Chapter 82 on integrals and divergences
  • Explore methods for evaluating integrals with singularities
  • Investigate the implications of lattice spacing on physical models
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students studying quantum field theory who are dealing with integrals involving divergences and regularization methods.

LAHLH
Messages
405
Reaction score
2
Hi,

I'm struggling with how to see that

[itex]\int^{L}_{0}\int^{L}_{0} \frac{dxdy}{(x-y)^2}=2L/a-2\ln{(L/a)}+\mathcal{O}(1)[/itex]

'a' here is a cutoff to avoid the divergence that occurs when x=y, I presume we just set the integrand to zero when x-y<a, I think.

Can anyone see why the above holds?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you written makes no sense. If there was no "a" in the integral, there cannot be an "a" in the result.
 
Well it's something the author does 'by hand' I guess, i.e. if x-y<a then set the integrand to zero, type approach. It's from Srednicki ch82 for some context and 'a' is lattice spacing. Since obviously the left hand side of the above integral is divergent really.

Based on some similar integrals I've seen in this subject I was thinking the method could work something like: integrand only depends on difference (x-y) thus might as well fix y at a given point say 0, then the y integral just contributes L and you get [itex]L \int^{L}_0 1/(x-0)^2[/itex], but now set the integrand to zero when x-y<a => [itex]L \int^{L}_a 1/(x)^2 =L[-1/L+1/a]=L/a-1[/itex]

which is sort of getting there but not quite..
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K