Integral with quadratic denominator^n

  • Thread starter Thread starter integral_int
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral Quadratic
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion focuses on computing the integral \(\int \frac{dx}{(ax^2+bx+c)^n}\) for real coefficients \(a\), \(b\), and \(c\) without using integration by parts or simplifying the quadratic expression. Two primary methods are proposed: differentiating with respect to a parameter (Hardy's method) and using partial fractions for complex roots. The discussion highlights the equivalence of the logarithmic and arctangent forms of the integral for both real and complex roots, while emphasizing the challenge of deriving these forms without simplifications.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integral calculus, specifically integration techniques.
  • Familiarity with quadratic functions and their properties.
  • Knowledge of complex numbers and their applications in integration.
  • Experience with differentiation under the integral sign (Hardy's method).
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of differentiating under the integral sign in detail.
  • Research partial fraction decomposition for integrals involving complex roots.
  • Explore the relationship between logarithmic and arctangent forms of integrals.
  • Learn about completing the square technique for quadratic expressions in integrals.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying calculus, and anyone interested in advanced integration techniques, particularly those dealing with rational functions and quadratic denominators.

integral_int
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'd like to compute

[tex]\int \frac{dx}{(ax^2+bx+c)^n}, a,b,c \in \mathbb{R}[/tex]

without resorting to the usual recursion relation method of solution

attachment.php?attachmentid=70136&stc=1&d=1401292396.png


i.e. without using integration by parts.

But I'd also like to do it without simplifying [itex]ax^2+bx+c[/itex] into anything like [itex]t^2+1[/itex], if I have to remember to use that simplification then I might as well just memorize the solution itself. I'd like to just work it out from first principles instead.

Homework Equations



There are two possible methods.

a) differentiating with respect to a parameter (Hardy's method):

b) Partial fractions allowing for complex roots

The Attempt at a Solution



a) differentiating with respect to a parameter (Hardy's method):

If I differentiate [itex]\frac{1}{ax^2+bx+c}[/itex] with respect to [itex]c[/itex] n-1 times we have

[tex]{\frac { \left( -1 \right) ^{n-1} }{ \left( n-1 \right) !}}{\frac {\partial }{\partial c^{n-1}}}\frac{1}{ a{x}^{2}+bx+c<br /> } = \frac{1}{ \left(a{x}^{2}+bx+c<br /> \right)^n}[/tex]

Then, if we know

[tex]\int \! \frac{1}{ a{x}^{2}+bx+c<br /> }{dx}=2\,\arctan \left( {<br /> \frac {2\,ax+b}{\sqrt {4\,ca-{b}^{2}}}} \right) {\frac {1}{\sqrt {4\,c<br /> a-{b}^{2}}}}[/tex]

the answer is simply

[tex]\int \! \frac{1}{ \left(a{x}^{2}+bx+c<br /> \right)^n}{dx}=<br /> {\frac { \left( -1 \right) ^{n-1} }{ \left( n-1 \right) !}}{\frac {\partial }{\partial c^{n-1}}}<br /> \left( 2\,\arctan \left( {\frac {2\,ax+b}{\sqrt {4\,ca-{b}^{2}}}}<br /> \right) {\frac {1}{\sqrt {4\,ca-{b}^{2}}}} \right)[/tex]

But computing [itex]\int \! \frac{1}{ a{x}^{2}+bx+c<br /> }{dx}=2\,\arctan \left( {<br /> \frac {2\,ax+b}{\sqrt {4\,ca-{b}^{2}}}} \right) {\frac {1}{\sqrt {4\,c<br /> a-{b}^{2}}}}[/itex] requires using those ugly [itex]t^2+1[/itex] simplifications, so we need another method.

b) Partial fractions allowing for complex roots

For n = 1, we have

[tex]\int \frac{dx}{ax^2+bx+c}=\frac{1}{a}\int \frac{dx}{(x-\alpha)(x-\beta)}=\frac{1}{a} \int \left( \frac{ \frac{1}{\alpha-\beta} }{x-\alpha} - \frac{\frac{1}{\alpha-\beta}}{x-\beta}\right)dx=\frac{1}{a} \frac{1}{\alpha-\beta} \ln\left|\frac{x-\alpha}{x-\beta}\right|[/tex]

But the usual solution is given as

[tex]\int \! \frac{1}{ a{x}^{2}+bx+c<br /> }{dx}=2\,\arctan \left( {<br /> \frac {2\,ax+b}{\sqrt {4\,ca-{b}^{2}}}} \right) {\frac {1}{\sqrt {4\,c<br /> a-{b}^{2}}}}[/tex]

This raises the question: is

[tex]\frac{1}{a} \frac{1}{\alpha-\beta} \ln\left|\frac{x-\alpha}{x-\beta}\right| = 2\,\arctan \left( {<br /> \frac {2\,ax+b}{\sqrt {4\,ca-{b}^{2}}}} \right) {\frac {1}{\sqrt {4\,c<br /> a-{b}^{2}}}}[/tex]

true for both cases, i.e. when the quadratic has either two real, non-zero, roots or complex conjugate roots?

If it is true, could someone show me how to derive the arctan form from the logarithm form, in both real root and complex conjugate root cases?

(I looked in Bronstein's Symbolic Integration book and it looks like a very complicated matter to show these are equal, but I may be misunderstanding this)

Once the n = 1 case is solved, I believe the n > 1 case will be solved because

5Oyp7.png


but this method does not look like it will give the arctan recursion relation solution

attachment.php?attachmentid=70136&stc=1&d=1401292396.png


So, can someone help me integrate [itex]\int \frac{dx}{(ax^2+bx+c)^n}, a,b,c \in \mathbb{R}[/itex]?
 

Attachments

  • Gours.png
    Gours.png
    24.4 KB · Views: 654
Physics news on Phys.org
integral_int said:

Homework Statement



I'd like to compute

[tex]\int \frac{dx}{(ax^2+bx+c)^n}, a,b,c \in \mathbb{R}[/tex]

without resorting to the usual recursion relation method of solution

attachment.php?attachmentid=70136&stc=1&d=1401292396.png


i.e. without using integration by parts.
...

...

(I looked in Bronstein's Symbolic Integration book and it looks like a very complicated matter to show these are equal, but I may be misunderstanding this)

Once the n = 1 case is solved, I believe the n > 1 case will be solved because

5Oyp7.png


but this method does not look like it will give the arctan recursion relation solution
...

So, can someone help me integrate [itex]\int \frac{dx}{(ax^2+bx+c)^n}, a,b,c \in \mathbb{R}[/itex]?
So, you don't like the integration by parts which gives "the usual recursion relation".

Then you have trouble with a solution which -- " this method does not look like it will give the arctan recursion relation solution".

That is all very puzzling .


I suggest integration by parts & evaluating the n = 1 case using completing the square.
 
Thanks for the response.

I don't understand what's puzzling about what I've asked help with? The partial fractions method should be equivalent to the recursion relation method, and in fact they are according to Bronstein. However I cannot see why

[tex]\frac{1}{a} \frac{1}{\alpha-\beta} \ln\left|\frac{x-\alpha}{x-\beta}\right| = 2\,\arctan \left( {<br /> \frac {2\,ax+b}{\sqrt {4\,ca-{b}^{2}}}} \right) {\frac {1}{\sqrt {4\,c<br /> a-{b}^{2}}}}[/tex]

If I follow your hint and complete the square on the denominator for n = 1 I am basically using a [itex]t^2+1p[/itex] simplification, and I'd like to avoid that method. Why integrate a quadratic denominator which gets hairy, when we can just straight-forwardly integrate linear denominators then convert it into the answer we'd get had we integrated the quadratic denominator?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K