Integrals involving Secant & Tangent Derivation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the integral of secant and tangent functions, specifically focusing on the expression involving secant raised to an even power and tangent raised to a variable power. Participants are examining the manipulation of these integrals and the underlying exponent rules.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to break down the integral involving secant and tangent, questioning the manipulation of exponents and the presence of differential elements. There is a focus on understanding the relationship between different powers of secant and the implications of exponent rules.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing feedback on each other's reasoning regarding exponent rules and integral setup. Some guidance has been offered regarding the correct interpretation of terms in the integral, and there is an acknowledgment of the need for clarity in the derivation process.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the application of exponent rules and the structure of the integral, with participants expressing uncertainty about the derivation steps and the relationship between terms. The original poster has noted a desire to focus on the derivation rather than the calculation itself.

Nano-Passion
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If the power of the secand is even and positive..
[tex]\int sec^{2k} x tan^{n} x dx = \int (sec^2 x)^{k-1} tan ^n x sec^2 x dx[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



The way I see it,

[tex]sec^{2k} x = sec^2 x dx * sec^k x dx[/tex]

the next step seems to be to break down sec^k, but on closer introspection, the break down goes something like this

[tex]sec^k x dx = (sec^2 x dx)^{k-1} = sec^{2k-2}x dx[/tex]

I'm having trouble intuitively accepting that something like 2k-2 = k. It doesn't seem to add up, there seems to be something a bit more complex into it that is left out of detail.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You may want to review your exponent rules.
 
gopher_p said:
You may want to review your exponent rules.

[tex](x^n)^m = x^{nm}[/tex]
[tex]sec^m x = (sec x)^m[/tex]
[tex](sec^2 x)^{k-1} = (sec x)^ {(2)(k-1)}[/tex]
 
OK. If ## x^{nm}=(x^n)^m ## (which is correct), then what is ## x^n\cdot x^m ##?
 
Nano-Passion said:

Homework Statement


If the power of the secand is even and positive..
[tex]\int sec^{2k} x tan^{n} x dx = \int (sec^2 x)^{k-1} tan ^n x sec^2 x dx[/tex]
This is right, note that there are two terms on the right integral.

Nano-Passion said:

The Attempt at a Solution



The way I see it,

[tex]sec^{2k} x = sec^2 x dx * sec^k x dx[/tex]

Umm, I don't think that's right remember that [tex]a^{b}*a^{c}=a^{b+c}[/tex]

I also don't know where your [tex]dx[/tex] terms are coming from there.

Nano-Passion said:
the next step seems to be to break down sec^k, but on closer introspection, the break down goes something like this

[tex]sec^k x dx = (sec^2 x dx)^{k-1} = sec^{2k-2}x dx[/tex]

I'm having trouble intuitively accepting that something like 2k-2 = k. It doesn't seem to add up, there seems to be something a bit more complex into it that is left out of detail.

You seem to have multiplied your exponents correctly, but forgot that there is another [tex]sec^{2}x[/tex] term in the right integral up top.

When doing this integral

[tex]\int sec^{2k} x tan^{n} x dx = \int (sec^2 x)^{k-1} tan ^n x sec^2 x dx[/tex]

From here there is a handy trig identity involving [tex]sec^{2}x[/tex] that you can use to make it into something easy to use u substitution on.
 
gopher_p said:
OK. If ## x^{nm}=(x^n)^m ## (which is correct), then what is ## x^n\cdot x^m ##?

[tex]= x^{n+m}[/tex]
 
InfinityZero said:
This is right, note that there are two terms on the right integral.
Umm, I don't think that's right remember that [tex]a^{b}*a^{c}=a^{b+c}[/tex]

I also don't know where your [tex]dx[/tex] terms are coming from there.[/tex]

I tend to do silly mistakes sometimes, just ignore them.

You seem to have multiplied your exponents correctly, but forgot that there is another [tex]sec^{2}x[/tex] term in the right integral up top.

When doing this integral

[tex]\int sec^{2k} x tan^{n} x dx = \int (sec^2 x)^{k-1} tan ^n x sec^2 x dx[/tex]

Oh there you go, now I get back the original expression. Thanks. ^.^

From here there is a handy trig identity involving [tex]sec^{2}x[/tex] that you can use to make it into something easy to use u substitution on.

I know about u substitution, the calculation is fairly trivial to me. What I was primarily concerned with is the derivation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K