Integrate 1/(x^2n + 1) with De Moivre's Theorem

  • Thread starter Thread starter FedEx
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the integral \(\int\frac{1}{x^{2n} + 1}\) and the potential application of De Moivre's theorem for its evaluation. Participants explore various methods and substitutions related to this integral.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of De Moivre's theorem and question its necessity. There are mentions of various substitutions, including trigonometric and hyperbolic functions, as well as power series. Some participants inquire about the specific requirements of the problem and the implications of using certain methods.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with multiple approaches being considered. Some participants express uncertainty about their methods and seek clarification on the use of De Moivre's theorem and other techniques. There is no explicit consensus on the best approach, and participants are actively engaging with each other's ideas.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that they have not been taught certain advanced techniques, such as the residue theorem or hyperbolic functions, which may limit their ability to fully engage with the problem. There is also a mention of a desire to learn more about these topics.

FedEx
Messages
318
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



\int\frac{1}{x^{2n} + 1}

Homework Equations



De moivre's theorem

The Attempt at a Solution



I am sorry moderators. I had posted this problem earlier on PF but i got no replies so i had to do it again.

I have tried almost every possible substitution. But in vain. So just one way left. Factorize the denominator using de moivre's theorem. I don't know why i am using de moivre but i do think that we may get some ease doing this integral by this method
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Did the question state specifically to use De Moivre's theorem?
What substitutions did you happen to use?

If you used De Moivre's theorem where did you reach when you put x=cos\theta + isin\theta ?
 
Are you doing the definite integral from -infinity to +infinity? In that case, sure, write down the poles using deMoivre and use the residue theorem.
 
Dick said:
Are you doing the definite integral from -infinity to +infinity? In that case, sure, write down the poles using deMoivre and use the residue theorem.

No. Its an indefinite integral. And we haven't been taught with the residue theorem.
 
rock.freak667 said:
Did the question state specifically to use De Moivre's theorem?
What substitutions did you happen to use?

If you used De Moivre's theorem where did you reach when you put x=cos\theta + isin\theta ?

x = (-1)^{\frac{1}{2n}}

\int\prod^{2n-1}_{k=1}\frac{1}{(x - cos\frac{2k\pi + \pi}{2n} + isin\frac{2k\pi + \pi}{2n})}
 
Last edited:
Well, you say De-Moivere's?
If you were to define this integral by I(n).
Then I(0)=x (upto a constant), do this by induction and by parts.
That will do the trick.
I(1)=arctg(x), I(2)=(do it by residue theorem for 1/(1+x^4)) for I(3)=S(1/(x^6+1)), the same.

You can do this with De-Moivere, but I need to think it over.
 
I think you need to do the substituition x=cosh(t) or sinh(t) and use the identity cosh^2(t)-sinh^2(t)=1.
 
I confess that I would solve this problem with power series. But that's probably a bad idea if you haven't learned methods for manipulating series efficiently, and I'm not sure if I got the answer in the simplest form either.
 
loop quantum gravity said:
Well, you say De-Moivere's?
If you were to define this integral by I(n).
Then I(0)=x (upto a constant), do this by induction and by parts.
That will do the trick.
I(1)=arctg(x), I(2)=(do it by residue theorem for 1/(1+x^4)) for I(3)=S(1/(x^6+1)), the same.

You can do this with De-Moivere, but I need to think it over.

We have been not taught with hyper trigonometric functions nor we have been taught to the residue theorem. How ever i would love to learn that. Any good resource which you could recommend me with? And would it be able for you to elaborate the above quoted post?
 
  • #10
Hurkyl said:
I confess that I would solve this problem with power series. But that's probably a bad idea if you haven't learned methods for manipulating series efficiently, and I'm not sure if I got the answer in the simplest form either.

To hell with the answer.I would love to solve the sum even if the answer come in complex numbers. But you could possibly tell me what do you mean by power series.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K