Integrate by Parts: Rules & Tips for (1/x)(e^-cx)dx

  • Thread starter Thread starter goel_heena
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrate parts
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the integration by parts technique applied to the integral of the form ∫(1/x)(e^(-cx))dx. Participants debate the appropriate choices for the functions u and dv, with suggestions including u = 1/x and dv = e^(-cx)dx. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately presenting the integral to determine solvability, noting that the Exponential Integral may arise in the solution. Ultimately, the consensus is that while integration by parts can be attempted, it may lead to complex expressions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integration techniques, specifically integration by parts.
  • Familiarity with the Exponential Integral function.
  • Knowledge of function differentiation and integration rules.
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic expressions involving exponentials.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the integration by parts formula: ∫u dv = uv - ∫v du.
  • Explore the properties and applications of the Exponential Integral function.
  • Practice solving integrals involving products of logarithmic and exponential functions.
  • Review examples of integration by parts with varying function choices to identify patterns.
USEFUL FOR

Students, educators, and professionals in mathematics or engineering fields who are looking to enhance their skills in integration techniques, particularly those involving exponential and logarithmic functions.

goel_heena
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi

Can anyone pls suggest the trick to do integration by parts such as:

Intergration {(1/x) (e^-cx) }dx.

Which function normally we should take as first and second function.
Is there a rule to decide on it.

Plz reply
thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
goel_heena said:
Hi

Can anyone pls suggest the trick to do integration by parts such as:

Intergration {(1/x) (e^-cx) }dx.

Which function normally we should take as first and second function.
Is there a rule to decide on it.

Plz reply
thanks

It takes a bit of practice to start noticing which function you should chose to be the one you differentiate or integrate, for the one you have I think it might be better to integrate 1/x and differentiate e, but I'm not completely sure how well that will work.
 
goel_heena said:
Hi

Can anyone pls suggest the trick to do integration by parts such as:

Intergration {(1/x) (e^-cx) }dx.

Which function normally we should take as first and second function.
Is there a rule to decide on it.

Plz reply
thanks

Here's a good rule: Try one and if it doesn't work, try the other! Surely that would have taken less time than waiting for a reply here.
 
Sorry to interrupt you guys, but can this expression be done by Integration by Parts?
It seems that the answer does contains the Exponential Integral. Am I missing something?
Unless it reads:
\int x e ^ x dx or something along those lines, I don't think Integration by Parts will work...
Am I missing something?
 
VietDao29 said:
Sorry to interrupt you guys, but can this expression be done by Integration by Parts?
It seems that the answer does contains the Exponential Integral. Am I missing something?
Unless it reads:
\int x e ^ x dx or something along those lines, I don't think Integration by Parts will work...
Am I missing something?

You can integrate an exponent;

\int e^{kx} = \frac{1}{k}e^{kx} + C

That's if I remember correctly...:confused:
 
Hootenanny said:
You can integrate an exponent;

\int e^{kx} = \frac{1}{k}e^{kx} + C

That's if I remember correctly...:confused:
Yes, of course, you can integrate exponents (and you seem to remember it correctly :smile: , just one note, you forgot the variable of integration :wink:). However, just look at the first post again, his integral is:
\int \frac{e ^ {-cx}}{x} dx, and not
\int e^{kx} dx :)
The Exponential Integral is a function which is like Sine Integral or Cosine Integral.
You may want to take a brief look at this page. He may also integrate that expression using series, but it's not going to give a nice result...
And I just wonder if it can be done with Integration by Parts. :confused:
 
Last edited:
VietDao29 said:
Sorry to interrupt you guys, but can this expression be done by Integration by Parts?
It seems that the answer does contains the Exponential Integral. Am I missing something?
Unless it reads:
\int x e ^ x dx or something along those lines, I don't think Integration by Parts will work...
Am I missing something?

Yes its read as \int x e ^ x dx ...
 
Something like this perhaps?

\int \; u\frac{dv}{dx} = uv - \int \; v\frac{du}{dx}

So if we let u = \frac{1}{x} and \frac{dv}{dx} = e^{-cx} gives;

= \frac{1}{x}\cdot\frac{-1}{c}e^{-cx} - \int\frac{-1}{c}e^{-cx}\cdot\frac{-1}{x^2}\;\;dx

I won't carry on because we're not suppose to show full solutions, but by the looks of it, it can be done...
 
goel_heena said:
Yes its read as \int x e ^ x dx ...
Err?
There's some huge differences from your first post. In your first post, you said:
goel_heena said:
Intergration {(1/x) (e^-cx) }dx.
and now you say it's Int xexdx... As far as I can tell, there's absolutely no similarity between the two... :frown:
goel_heena, it's important to post the problem exactly.
------------------
by the way, have you tried anything?
Now if you choose u = ex, dv = xdx, then you'll have:
\int x e ^ x dx = \frac{1}{2} x ^ 2 e ^ x - \frac{1}{2} \int x ^ 2 e ^ x dx. Arrghh, it looks even more complicated then your original integral, so let's try another way.
This time, what should be u, and what should be dv, you think?
Can you go from here? :)
 
  • #10
Hootenanny said:
Something like this perhaps?

\int \; u\frac{dv}{dx} = uv - \int \; v\frac{du}{dx}
No offense, but are you sure that's the right formula for Integration by Parts? Where is your variable of integraion? Please, make sure that you are sure about something before helping someone else, or you may just make them more confused.
The correct version:
\int u dv = uv - \int vdu.
So if we let u = \frac{1}{x} and \frac{dv}{dx} = e^{-cx} gives;

= \frac{1}{x}\cdot\frac{-1}{c}e^{-cx} - \int\frac{-1}{c}e^{-cx}\cdot\frac{-1}{x^2}\;\;dx

I won't carry on because we're not suppose to show full solutions, but by the looks of it, it can be done...
IMO, that looks way harder than the original integral. :frown:
 
  • #11
goel_heena said:
Yes its read as \int x e ^ x dx ...

Wait a minute! What is your question

It is (1)
\int \; xe^{-cx} \;\; dx

or it it (2)
\int \; \frac{e^{-cx}}{x} \;\; dx

?

As VietDao said, it is very important to accurately present your question. Either equation is solvable using the integration by parts.
 
  • #12
VietDao29 said:
No offense, but are you sure that's the right formula for Integration by Parts? Where is your variable of integraion? Please, make sure that you are sure about something before helping someone else, or you may just make them more confused.
The correct version:
\int u dv = uv - \int vdu.

IMO, that looks way harder than the original integral. :frown:

Yes I do know about it. It is the correct formula, it is equivalent to your formula. My variable of integration is dx.
 
  • #13
Looking at it now the better subsitution could be

u = e^{-cx}

\frac{dv}{dx} = \frac{1}{x}

I don't know, I haven't worked through the problem, but this one looks like the most promising
 
  • #14
Hootenanny said:
...Either equation is solvable using the integration by parts.
Are you sure the second one is solvable? :wink:
Looking at it now the better subsitution could be

u = e^{-cx}

\frac{dv}{dx} = \frac{1}{x}

I don't know, I haven't worked through the problem, but this one looks like the most promising
Hmm, one last advice, please work it out first, before making such assumption. :smile:
And as I pointed out in my previous post, I don't see it very promising. :frown: Don't be surprised if you keep getting monstrous expressions by using Integration by Parts. :)
 
Last edited:
  • #15
VietDao29 said:
Are you sure the second one is solvable? :wink:

Hmm, one last advice, please work it out first, before making such assumption. :smile:
And as I pointed out in my previous post, I don't see it very promising. :frown:

Point taken...:blushing:
 

Similar threads

Should the Units of a Constant Match the Integral Boundary Conditions?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Solve ##\int\frac{e^{-x}}{x^2}dx## and ##\int \frac{e^{-x}}{x}dx##
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Integral of (xsin(t))....Two Variables in Single Variable Calc Integral
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Evaluate ##\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-|x|}\delta(x^2 +2x -3) dx##
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
How Do You Correctly Apply Integration by Parts to ∫-e^(2x)*sin(e^x) dx?
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Integrate (xsinx - cosx)/x^2 with Intro Calc Techniques
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
A line integral about a closed "unit triangle" around the origin
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Solve Integral Equation: xe-axcos(x)dx from 0 to ∞
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
How To Integrate 1/[sqrt (x^2 + 3x + 2)] dx?
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
6K
A doubt in Partial fraction decomposition
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K