Integrate x/(x+1)^1/2 - Solving a Tricky Integration Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter mcelgiraffe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrate
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves the integration of the function x/√(x+1), which has led to various approaches and discussions among participants regarding the best method to solve it.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to use a trigonometric substitution involving a right triangle, leading to a complex expression. Some participants question the effectiveness of this approach and suggest a simpler substitution method instead.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different methods for solving the integral. While one participant appreciates the simpler substitution suggested by another, there is no explicit consensus on the best approach, indicating a productive exchange of ideas.

Contextual Notes

The original poster expresses frustration with the complexity of their current method and acknowledges the helpfulness of alternative suggestions provided by others.

mcelgiraffe
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am trying to work a problem that seems to have me stumped.

∫x/√(x+1) dx


I have tried to look at it as a right triangle with:
hypotenouse = √(x+1)
sideA = 1
sideB = √x

So I have:
cot^2 ∅=x, dx=-2cot∅csc^2 ∅ d∅
csc∅=√(x+1)

Working through the problem I have
-2∫(cot^2 ∅/csc∅) * cot∅csc^2 ∅ d∅
-2∫cot^3 ∅ * csc∅ d∅
-2∫(cos^3 ∅/sin^3 ∅) * (1/sin∅) d∅
-2∫cos^3 ∅/sin^4 ∅ d∅

Trying to solve it from here using more identities just keeps getting messier and I don't seem to be making any progress.

So, my main question is "am I on the right track?" or "is there an easier way that I am overlooking?"

Thank You,

James
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's a way easier route. Try the substitution u=x+1. x=u-1. The triangles aren't helping at all.
 
See Dick's post for doing it the right way.

For triangle method:
http://img403.imageshack.us/img403/3350/33956029eq1.jpg

I don't know how you made it that complicated.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I am not sure how I made it that difficult except that I have been staring at this way too long today. Dicks method was much easier and greatly appreciated. Thanks to both of you.

James
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K