Integrated track length in electromagnetic shower

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The integrated track length in an electromagnetic shower is directly proportional to the initial energy, ##E_0##, as derived from the equation $$T_{int}=x_0(\frac{E_0}{E_c}-1)/\ln(2)$$. The analysis involves calculating the total track length based on the number of particles produced until the terminal energy, ##E_c##, and incorporates the radiation length, ##x_0##. The conclusion highlights that while the relationship is proportional, it includes a constant factor that must be accounted for in precise calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic showers and their properties
  • Familiarity with radiation length, ##x_0##
  • Knowledge of logarithmic functions and their applications in physics
  • Basic calculus for evaluating integrals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electromagnetic shower equations in particle physics
  • Explore the implications of radiation length in high-energy physics experiments
  • Investigate the behavior of particle showers at varying energy levels
  • Learn about the statistical models used in particle track counting
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of particle physics, and researchers involved in high-energy experiments who seek to understand the dynamics of electromagnetic showers and their implications in experimental setups.

vbrasic
Messages
71
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Show that integrated track length in EM-shower is proportional to ##E_0##.

Homework Equations


##E(t)=\frac{E_0}{2^t}##, with radiation length, ##x_0##. Knowledge that shower terminates at ##E_c##.

The Attempt at a Solution


The total track length is naturally the total number of particles in the shower (until terminal ##E_c##) multiplied by the radiation length. Therefore, I have, $$T_{int}=x_0\int_0^{t_{max}}2^t\,dt,$$ where ##t_{max}=\log_2{\frac{E_0}{E_c}}##. Therefore, I have, $$T_{int}=x_0(\frac{2^{t_{max}}}{\ln(2)}-\frac{1}{\ln(2)})=\frac{x_0}{\ln(2)}(\frac{E_0}{E_c}-1).$$

However, this is not exactly proportional to ##E_0##, evidently differing by a constant. Any ideas on where I may be going wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can assume that ##\frac {E_0}{ E_c} \gg 1## - otherwise there would be no shower.

The assumption that your track number is a continuous real number is an approximation anyway - you never have 1.1, 1.2462, ... tracks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K