Integrating by Parts: Solving ∫r^3/(4+r^2)^(1/2) dr

  • Thread starter Thread starter AnnieF
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrating parts
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves evaluating the integral ∫r^3/(4+r^2)^(1/2) dr, which falls under the subject area of calculus, specifically integration techniques.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply integration by parts but encounters difficulties, leading to uncertainty about their approach. Some participants suggest using substitution instead, questioning the necessity of integration by parts and offering alternative substitutions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring different methods for solving the integral. There are suggestions for both integration by parts and substitution, indicating a variety of interpretations regarding the best approach. No consensus has been reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are discussing the appropriateness of different integration techniques, with some expressing confusion about the original poster's challenges. There is an emphasis on finding a simpler method to evaluate the integral.

AnnieF
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



∫r^3/(4+r^2)^(1/2) dr

Homework Equations



∫udv=uv-∫vdu

The Attempt at a Solution



I know that integration by parts must be used. I tried doing it with 4+r^2 as u, but kept running into issues..then I got an answer but it appears to be wrong. I guess I am not sure how to do this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First substitute r^2=t, then integrate by parts.ehild
 
I don't think it needs integration by parts. I'd do a simple u substitution. u=r^2+4, like AnnieF suggested. What 'issues' were you running into?
 
Dick said:
I don't think it needs integration by parts. I'd do a simple u substitution. u=r^2+4, like AnnieF suggested. What 'issues' were you running into?

The substitution u=r^2 would be significantly easier to deal with. One can then use parts or another substitution to make the integral elementary.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K