Integrating Expo Homework Solutions

  • Thread starter Thread starter jwxie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around integrating two expressions involving exponential and logarithmic functions, specifically the integrals of e^(-ln(x)) and 2/(sqrt(x)) * e^(sqrt(x)). Participants are exploring the implications of negative exponents and substitution methods in integration.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the equivalence of e^(-ln(x)) to 1/x and question the treatment of negative exponents in integration. There is a focus on substitution methods, particularly using u = sqrt(x) and the implications of negative signs in expressions.

Discussion Status

The conversation includes various attempts at substitution and integration, with some participants expressing confusion over the steps involved. There is a recognition of the need to clarify the correct application of substitution and the handling of negative exponents, but no consensus has been reached on the final approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of correctly rewriting expressions in terms of u and du, and there are references to external resources like Wolfram Alpha for additional clarification. Some participants acknowledge typos and misunderstandings in their initial statements.

jwxie
Messages
278
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



[1] integral of e^(-ln(x))
[2] integral of 2/(sqrt(x)) * e^(sqrt(x)))

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



Is [1] the same as writing 1/e^lnx?

In general, example of 1 and 2, we treat the negative of an expo power, e^-x as 1/e^x right?

So for [2], u = sqrt(x) (from the e), should be written as -sqrt(x)?

I thought in regular integration:
x^2 / x^3 , where u is x^3, and it is not equivalent as -x^3, or x^-3
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jwxie said:

Homework Statement



[1] integral of e^(-ln(x))
[2] integral of 2/(sqrt(x)) * e^(sqrt(x)))

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



Is [1] the same as writing 1/e^lnx?
Yes, but you might as well take it a step further, since 1/e^(lnx) = 1/x, when x > 0.
jwxie said:
In general, example of 1 and 2, we treat the negative of an expo power, e^-x as 1/e^x right?

So for [2], u = sqrt(x) (from the e), should be written as -sqrt(x)?
Are you asking whether e^(sqrt(x)) = sqrt(x)? No, it's not. If that' not what you're asking, please clarify
jwxie said:
I thought in regular integration:
x^2 / x^3 , where u is x^3, and it is not equivalent as -x^3, or x^-3
 
Hi, thanks. For [2] I am sorry, I wasn't clear.

There was a typo in [2]
here is the right one, with answer from wolfram alpha
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=integral+of++2%2F%28sqrt%28x%29+*+e^%28sqrt%28x%29%29%29

Initially I took sqrt(x) as my u variable (from e), and du = 1/2 sqrt(x)^-1/2 dx

This would never get a negative, so I turned to our previous agreement that, e^-x = 1/e^x

This is being done in wolfram alpha... And usually I avoid taking - exponent whenever possible...

I thought in general, a / b^x, where b^x = b^-x, I can ignore the minus in u substitution

So can you show me how to solve [2] without using the method (take -exponent), and go straight with the original format?
 
b^x does not equal b^-x; 1/b^x equals b^-x. You can't randomly ignore negative signs.

You have u and you have du, so just rewrite everything in the original integral in terms of u and du and integrate the result.
 
e^-x = 1/e^x

now if you check the link i provided, you will see wolfram alpha show a step that i don't understand.

click on that link, and click on show steps

WA rewrites the original function to e^-sqrt(x)/sqrt(x), so that u = -sqrt(x)

but as i said, usually i do it straightforward, so that in general, a/b^x, i don't care 1/b^x = b^-x, i can just put u = b^x
for example
2/2x, can be rewritten as 2( 2*x^-1)./ However, i don't have to worry about the minus sign in 2/2x form
i got stright to 2/2x, u = 2x, du = 2 dx, so 1/2du = dx

compare this to what i just said about wolfram, you will see my point
 
2/2x, can be rewritten as 2( 2*x^-1)./
Not true. 2(2*x-1) = 4/x [itex]\neq[/itex]2/(2x)

Simplify it first. 2/(2x) = 1/x = x-1
 
Mark44 said:
Not true. 2(2*x-1) = 4/x [itex]\neq[/itex]2/(2x)

Simplify it first. 2/(2x) = 1/x = x-1

Hi. Thanks. I am such a fool thatI get these simple things wrong.

Yes you are right.
1/x = x^-1
So let's stick with this one

I would use 1/x, where u = x, and du = 1 dx
This would not require negative exponent at all

So in my attempt

(2/sqrt(x) * e^(sqrt(x)) <=----- the original function
u = sqrt(x)
du = 1/2 sqrt-1(x) dx
solve for dx, I get 2 sqrt(x) du = dx, and this i can replace dx by that expression

i get 2*sqrt(x) * 2 / sqrt(x) e^u
this produce 4/e^u
integral of 4/e^u, take out the 4, i am left with 1/e^u, but this cannot be solve unless we turn it back to -1 power, so integral of e^-u gives -1/1 * e^-u, and so the final answer is -4e^-u

now i get it.
thanks.
 
Last edited:
jwxie said:
(2/sqrt(x) * e^(sqrt(x)) <=----- the original function
u = sqrt(x)
du = 1/2 sqrt-1(x) dx
solve for dx, I get 2 sqrt(x) du = dx, and this i can replace dx by that expression

i get 2*sqrt(x) * 2 / sqrt(x) e^u
this produce 4/e^u
integral of 4/e^u, take out the 4, i am left with 1/e^u, but this cannot be solve unless we turn it back to -1 power, so integral of e^-u gives -1/1 * e^-u, and so the final answer is -4e^-u

now i get it.
I don't think you do. For one thing, your final answer should not be in terms of x. You need to "undo" your substitution. For another thing, the antiderivative you got is not correct.

You are making this much more complicated than it really. For this integral -
[tex]\int \frac{2}{\sqrt{x}} e^{\sqrt{x}} dx[/tex]

You have the right substitution, u = sqrt(x), so du = dx/(2sqrt(x)). Notice that the integral has almost what you need for du.
 
Mark44 said:
I don't think you do. For one thing, your final answer should not be in terms of x. You need to "undo" your substitution. For another thing, the antiderivative you got is not correct.

You are making this much more complicated than it really. For this integral -
[tex]\int \frac{2}{\sqrt{x}} e^{\sqrt{x}} dx[/tex]

You have the right substitution, u = sqrt(x), so du = dx/(2sqrt(x)). Notice that the integral has almost what you need for du.

Sorry, I mean this integral...
gossh I should be more considerate next time by putting it in latex form, lol
[tex]\int \frac{2}{{\sqrt{x}} e^{\sqrt{x}}}dx[/tex]
 
  • #10
I attempted the problem using a u - sub. Bare with me, my solution may not be correct, however here is my idea. I is integral sign

sub u = sqrt(x) .. The integral becomes 4 I u / u e^ u du = 4 I e ^ - u du. = 4 ( sinh( u) - cosh (u )) + K. Sub back and finish up.

EDIt:: That should be - 4 I e ^ -u du = - 4 ( sinh ( u ) - cosh ( u ) ) + K.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K