Integrating Factor Homework: Solving Diff. Eq w/ Constants

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a differential equation involving the function ##C_{B}##, which is dependent on ##\tau'##, with constants ##k_{1}##, ##k_{2}##, and ##C_{A0}##. The equation presented is of the form \(\frac {dC_{B}}{d \tau'} + k_{2}C_{B} = k_{1}C_{A0}e^{-k_{1} \tau'}\), and participants are exploring the use of an integrating factor to find a solution.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the integrating factor and the subsequent steps required to solve the equation. There are questions about the need to "separate" terms and the integration process. Some participants express confusion about the integration step and the interpretation of the integrating factor's role.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the integration process and boundary conditions. There is a recognition of differing interpretations regarding the steps to take after applying the integrating factor. Some participants have offered clarifications, but no consensus has been reached on the final solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information they can share or the methods they can use. The boundary condition ##C_{B} = 0## at ##\tau' = 0## is also a point of discussion, influencing the solution approach.

gfd43tg
Gold Member
Messages
949
Reaction score
48

Homework Statement


##C_{B}## is a function of ##\tau'##, and ##k_{1}##,##k_{2}##, and ##C_{A0}## are constants. I want to solve this differential equation
\frac {dC_{B}}{d \tau'} + k_{2}C_{B} = k_{1}C_{A0}e^{-k_{1} \tau'}

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Using the integrating factor, we get
\frac {d(C_{B}e^{k_{2} \tau&#039;})}{d \tau&#039;} = k_{1}C_{A0}e^{(k_{2} - k_{1})<br /> \tau&#039;}

However, from here I am unsure how to separate this. I was thinking of using chain rule on the inside, but that seems to only get me back to where I started (that's the purpose of the integrating factor??)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The next step is to integrate both sides with respect to \tau&#039;. By the fundamental theorem of calculus, the integral of the left hand side is
\int \frac{d}{d\tau&#039;} (C_Be^{k_2 \tau&#039;})\,d\tau&#039; = C_Be^{k_2 \tau&#039;} + \mbox{constant}.
 
I don't know what you mean by "separate" or what it is you want to "separate". There is no need to "separate" anything- just go ahead and integrate:
\frac{d C_Be^{k_2\tau&#039;}}{d\tau&#039;}= k_1C_{A0}e^{(k_2- k_1)\tau&#039;}
\int d C_Be^{k_2\tau&#039;}= \int k_1C_{A0}e^{(k_2- k_1)\tau&#039;} d\tau&#039;

C_Be^{k_2\tau&#039;}= \frac{k_1C_{A0}}{k_2- k_1}e^{(k_2- k_1)}\tau&#039;+ C

That's the whole point of an "integrating factor".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gfd43tg
C_{B} e^{k_{2} \tau&#039;} = \frac {k_{1}C_{A0}}{k_{2} - k_{1}} e^{(k_{2} - k_{1}) \tau&#039;} + C
My boundary condition is ##C_{B} = 0## at ##\tau' = 0##, this means ##C = -\frac {k_{1}C_{A0}}{k_{2} - k_{1}}##

Then the solution is
C_{B} = \frac {k_{1}C_{A0}}{k_{2} - k_{1}} e^{(k_{2} - k_{1}) \tau&#039;} - \frac {k_{1}C_{A0}}{k_{2} - k_{1}}

But the solution given is
C_{B} = k_{1}C_{A0} \Big( \frac {e^{-k_{1} \tau&#039;} - e^{-k_{2}<br /> \tau&#039;}}{k_{2} - k_{1}} \Big)
 
Maylis said:
C_{B} e^{k_{2} \tau&#039;} = \frac {k_{1}C_{A0}}{k_{2} - k_{1}} e^{(k_{2} - k_{1}) \tau&#039;} + C
My boundary condition is ##C_{B} = 0## at ##\tau' = 0##, this means ##C = -\frac {k_{1}C_{A0}}{k_{2} - k_{1}}##

Then the solution is
C_{B} = \frac {k_{1}C_{A0}}{k_{2} - k_{1}} e^{(k_{2} - k_{1}) \tau&#039;} - \frac {k_{1}C_{A0}}{k_{2} - k_{1}}

No, so far you have <br /> C_B e^{k_2 \tau&#039;} = \frac {k_{1}C_{A0}}{k_{2} - k_{1}} e^{(k_{2} - k_{1}) \tau&#039;} - \frac {k_{1}C_{A0}}{k_{2} - k_{1}}.<br />
Dividing both sides by e^{k_2 \tau&#039;} yields the given solution.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gfd43tg
Woops, I see where I made my mistake. Thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K