Integrating ma+kx=0 to get x(t)

  • Thread starter Thread starter teme92
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrating
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the integration of the equation ma + kx = 0 to derive the function x(t). Participants are exploring the implications of this second-order differential equation in the context of motion and oscillation.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the necessity of specifying the variable of integration and maintaining equality during integration. There are attempts to integrate acceleration and position, with some questioning the correctness of the integration steps taken. Others suggest alternative methods, such as multiplying by dx/dt before integrating.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various interpretations of the problem being explored. Some participants have offered guidance on integrating the equation correctly, while others are seeking clarification on the constants of integration and their relevance to the solution.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of confusion regarding the interpretation of constants of integration and the reference frame, indicating that assumptions may be under discussion. The original poster expresses uncertainty about the integration process and the absence of time variables in their attempts.

teme92
Messages
185
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



As stated in the title, I'm having trouble integrating ma+kx=0 to get x(t)

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



So I know I have to integrate twice but I'm not getting the answer required.

∫a = -k/m∫x

v = (-k/m)[(x²/2) + C]
∫v = (-k/2m)∫x² + (-kC/m)
x = (-k/2m)x³/3 + (-kC/m)

This is clearly wrong because I have no time variables. Any help would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Integral of a is meaningless if you don't specify the variable of integration. Same for integral of x.
And you need to integrate over the same variable on both sides to maintain the equality.
If you integrate over time you have
[tex]\int a dt = -k/m \int x dt[/tex]
The second integral is not x^2/2.
 
Hey nasu thanks for the reply.

∫xdt = xt +C

Then after integrating the second time:

∫vdt = (-k/m)∫xtdt
x = (-k/m)xt²/2 +C

I'm unsure about the constant of integration and whether there should be two or not.
 
teme92 said:

Homework Statement



As stated in the title, I'm having trouble integrating ma+kx=0 to get x(t)

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



So I know I have to integrate twice but I'm not getting the answer required.

∫a = -k/m∫x

v = (-k/m)[(x²/2) + C]
∫v = (-k/2m)∫x² + (-kC/m)
x = (-k/2m)x³/3 + (-kC/m)

This is clearly wrong because I have no time variables. Any help would be much appreciated.

You are trying to solve [tex]\frac{d^2 x}{dt^2} + \frac km x = 0.[/tex] This is a second-order linear homogenous ODE with constant coefficients, so its solution is [itex]Ae^{\lambda_1 x} + Be^{\lambda_2 x}[/itex] where [itex]\lambda_1[/itex], [itex]\lambda_2[/itex] are the roots of [tex]\lambda^2 + \frac km = 0.[/tex] You will want to use the relations [tex] \cos x = \frac{e^{ix} + e^{-ix}}{2}, \\<br /> \sin x = \frac{e^{ix} - e^{-ix}}{2i}.[/tex]

Alternatively, first multiply by [itex]dx/dt[/itex] and only then integrate with respect to time. The result on taking square roots is a first-order separable ODE.
 
Hey pasmith, thanks for the reply. So the solution you posted is equal to x(t)? The answer given is 0.5a + b
 
One of us is confused. If [itex]a[/itex] is constant, then [tex]\frac{d^2x}{dt^2} = a[/tex] yields [tex]x(t) = \frac12 at^2 + bt + c.[/tex] However the problem which appears in the OP is [itex]ma + kx = 0[/itex], which can only be interpreted as an equation of motion if [itex]a(t) = \frac{d^2x}{dt^2}[/itex], and the solution is then [tex]x(t) = A\cos(\sqrt{\tfrac km} t) + B\sin(\sqrt{\tfrac km} t).[/tex]
 
Well I remember from class that the constant of integration can basically be removed from the equation depending on where you set your reference frame. I'll ask my professor to clarify the question tomorrow in class. Thanks for the help guys.
 
teme92 said:
Hey nasu thanks for the reply.

∫xdt = xt +C

Then after integrating the second time:

∫vdt = (-k/m)∫xtdt
x = (-k/m)xt²/2 +C

I'm unsure about the constant of integration and whether there should be two or not.

No, x is not a constant but a function of t. You cannot integrate that way.
This is why you have to do what pasmith showed you.
And the constant of integration cannot avoid this.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
939
Replies
30
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K