Integrating x-y Along Contour: Step-by-Step Guide

  • Thread starter Thread starter Polamaluisraw
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating the integral ∫_{\gamma}(x-y)dz, where the contour γ is parametrized by z(t) = e^{it} for the interval π/2 ≤ t ≤ 3π/2. Participants are exploring the integration of complex functions along a contour in the complex plane.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss breaking down the integral and substituting the parameterization variable. There are attempts to clarify the relationships between x, y, and t, as well as the correct form of dz. Questions arise regarding the setup of the substitution and the evaluation of the integral.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on using parameterization and substitution, while others express confusion about the setup and evaluation process. There is a mix of attempts to clarify concepts and check assumptions, but no consensus has been reached on the correct approach or solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention frustration with the complexity of the problem and the time it is taking to understand the concepts involved. There is an indication that certain assumptions or definitions may need further exploration.

Polamaluisraw
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement

∫[itex]_{\gamma}[/itex](x-y)dz where [itex]\gamma[/itex] has parametrization: z(t) = e[itex]^{it}[/itex] for [itex]\pi[/itex]/2 [itex]\leq[/itex] t [itex]\leq[/itex] 3[itex]\pi[/itex]/2

Homework Equations


the integral of the sum is the sum of the integral

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to break it up and see if I could evaluate it as I normally would but it started to get really messy and I think I was going about it wrong.

z=exp(it) and dz=iexp(it)
∫(x)dz - i∫(y)dz

can someone please push me into the right direction? thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
as you mean to evaluate directly you need to use a substitute for the parameterisation variable

[tex] \cint_{\gamma} f(z) dz = \int_{t_a}^T_b f(z(t)) z'(t) dt[/tex]
 
could you elaborate just a little more? I really appreciate your help
 
what don't you understand? I won't do the problem for you, but am happy to help
 
I don't understand how to set up a substitution so I can get it into a form that I know how to work with
 
You intend that z= x+ iy, right? So if [itex]z= e^{it}= cos(t)+ i sin(t)[/itex] what are x and y in terms of t?
 
Okay this is what I have so far:

∫[itex]_{\gamma}[/itex](x-y)dz where [itex]\gamma[/itex] has parametrization: z(t)=e[itex]^{it}[/itex] for [itex]\pi[/itex]/2[itex]\leq[/itex]t[itex]\leq[/itex]3[itex]\pi[/itex]/2∫[itex]_{\gamma}[/itex](x-y)dz = ∫[itex]_{\gamma}[/itex](cos(t)-isin(t))dz

which we can break up like,

∫[itex]_{\gamma}[/itex](cos(t))dz - i∫[itex]_{\gamma}[/itex](sin(t))dz

since z(t)=e[itex]^{it}[/itex] then dz=ie[itex]^{it}[/itex]

so we have

∫[itex]_{\gamma}[/itex](cos(t))(ie[itex]^{it}[/itex]) - i∫[itex]_{\gamma}[/itex](sin(t))(ie[itex]^{it}[/itex] )

is this correct so far?

or would my dz be -sin(t)+icos(t)?
 
Last edited:
you may want to check your "y" value, remember z= x+ iy,
 
so instead of isin(t) just simply sin(t)

∫[itex]_{\gamma}[/itex](x-y)dz = ∫[itex]_{\gamma}[/itex](cos(t)-sin(t))dz

∫cos(t)dz-∫sin(t)dz

every time I try evaluating the above expression I never can seem to get the correct answer. I'm using ie^(it) for my dz

AHHH I am getting so frustrated. I feel like I am missing an important concept, this problem should not take me this much time
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K