- #1
negation
- 817
- 0
Homework Statement
Derive equation 2.10 by integration equation 2.7 over time. You'll have to interpret the constant of integration.
Integration and interpretation of constant of acceleration-answer chec
- Thread starter negation
- Start date
Click For Summary
Homework Help Overview
The discussion revolves around deriving an equation related to integration in the context of motion, specifically focusing on the interpretation of the constant of acceleration. Participants are examining the relationship between different equations presented in the problem statement.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation
Approaches and Questions Raised
- Participants are attempting to derive a specific equation through integration and are discussing the correct notation for displacement in the equations. There are questions regarding the proper representation of variables and constants in the context of the derivation.
Discussion Status
The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on the notation used in the equations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the correct terminology for displacement, but there is no explicit consensus on the derivation process itself.
Contextual Notes
There appears to be a focus on the correct interpretation of variables and constants in the equations, with some participants questioning the initial conditions and definitions used in the problem setup.
Derive equation 2.10 by integration equation 2.7 over time. You'll have to interpret the constant of integration.
- #2
rude man
Science Advisor
- 8,032
- 870
OK except the 2nd eq. in jpg2 should not start with δx.
- #3
negation
- 817
- 0
rude man said:
It should be xf or known as final displacement.
- #4
rude man
Science Advisor
- 8,032
- 870
negation said:
Right.
Similar threads
- · Replies 20 ·
- · Replies 20 ·
- · Replies 7 ·
- · Replies 6 ·
- · Replies 1 ·
- · Replies 7 ·