Integration Bounds for E-field Calcualtion

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 1K views
Ren Figueroa
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi guys.
I’m looking at the brute force way at getting the E-field for a uniformly spherical charge distribution. The location of the E-field of interest is anywhere outside of the sphere. Here are some images

2144084E-89F7-4467-9BDF-A100591ED4FE.jpeg

815293ED-B605-4270-851E-CC04F3C598B9.jpeg

Everything makes sense. I’m just not sure why the bounds for ‘s’ where z-r to z+r. From my perspective, z+r is the left hemisphere while z-r is the right hemisphere because we can consider the relationship between s, r, and z from the vector relation s=z-r. If i set the positive axis to point to the left, if sort of makes sense to integrate from z+r to z-r but this would obviously yield a negative result. So, I’m curious about detmining the proper bounds.
 

Attachments

  • 2144084E-89F7-4467-9BDF-A100591ED4FE.jpeg
    2144084E-89F7-4467-9BDF-A100591ED4FE.jpeg
    47.4 KB · Views: 766
  • 815293ED-B605-4270-851E-CC04F3C598B9.jpeg
    815293ED-B605-4270-851E-CC04F3C598B9.jpeg
    52.8 KB · Views: 645
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm so embarrassed. You're right. Just plugging in the prior bounds gets the result. I thought of doing that but I sort of just eye-balled it and thought it wouldn't give me the result I was looking for. Sorry about that.

It's a text by Corson and Lorrain. Definitely not as rigorous as the Stratton text.