Integration Bounds for E-field Calcualtion

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the integration bounds for calculating the electric field (E-field) of a uniformly spherical charge distribution, specifically outside the sphere. The correct bounds for 's' are identified as z-r to z+r, aligning with the spherical coordinates transformation. The participants clarify that the integration limits correspond to the angles θ = 0 and θ = π, which relate to the geometry of the problem. The reference texts mentioned include Corson and Lorrain, as well as Stratton, highlighting differences in rigor and approach.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and charge distributions
  • Familiarity with spherical coordinates and integration techniques
  • Knowledge of vector relations in physics
  • Experience with mathematical rigor in physics textbooks
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric fields from charge distributions using integration
  • Explore spherical coordinate transformations in electromagnetism
  • Review the differences in rigor between Corson and Lorrain and Stratton's texts
  • Learn about the implications of integration limits in physical calculations
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, electrical engineers, and anyone involved in electrostatics or mathematical physics who seeks to deepen their understanding of electric field calculations and integration techniques.

Ren Figueroa
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi guys.
I’m looking at the brute force way at getting the E-field for a uniformly spherical charge distribution. The location of the E-field of interest is anywhere outside of the sphere. Here are some images

2144084E-89F7-4467-9BDF-A100591ED4FE.jpeg

815293ED-B605-4270-851E-CC04F3C598B9.jpeg

Everything makes sense. I’m just not sure why the bounds for ‘s’ where z-r to z+r. From my perspective, z+r is the left hemisphere while z-r is the right hemisphere because we can consider the relationship between s, r, and z from the vector relation s=z-r. If i set the positive axis to point to the left, if sort of makes sense to integrate from z+r to z-r but this would obviously yield a negative result. So, I’m curious about detmining the proper bounds.
 

Attachments

  • 2144084E-89F7-4467-9BDF-A100591ED4FE.jpeg
    2144084E-89F7-4467-9BDF-A100591ED4FE.jpeg
    47.4 KB · Views: 747
  • 815293ED-B605-4270-851E-CC04F3C598B9.jpeg
    815293ED-B605-4270-851E-CC04F3C598B9.jpeg
    52.8 KB · Views: 632
Physics news on Phys.org
I think what happens here is that when the book does the change of coordinates, it matches limits of integration appropriately. When θ = 0 (lower limit), s = z - r and when θ = π (upper limit), s = z + r.

By the way, is this Stratton's book you're looking at?
 
I'm so embarrassed. You're right. Just plugging in the prior bounds gets the result. I thought of doing that but I sort of just eye-balled it and thought it wouldn't give me the result I was looking for. Sorry about that.

It's a text by Corson and Lorrain. Definitely not as rigorous as the Stratton text.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
967
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K