MHB Integration by Partial Fraction Decomposition - Yahoo Answers

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the integral ∫ (x^5 + 2x^3 - 3x)dx / (x^2 + 1)^3 using partial fraction decomposition. The numerator is factored to x(x + 1)(x - 1)(x^2 + 3), and the integrand is expressed in terms of partial fractions with repeated quadratic factors. By equating coefficients after expanding the right side, the constants A, B, C, D, E, and F are determined, leading to the decomposition of the integrand. The integral is then solved using substitution, resulting in the final expression involving the natural logarithm and a polynomial term. This method illustrates the process of integrating rational functions through partial fraction decomposition.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

I have problems solving this(integration by partial fractions)?


∫ (x^5 + 2x^3 - 3x)dx / (x^2 + 1)^3

I really don't know. Partial fractions. I know that you're supposed to do something like Ax+B when it comes to quadratic eqn's and you're supposed to give another arbitrary constant when it's raised to a power. but I don't think I can do it unless there's something else with it and I have no idea how to factor it. I really should've listened to our earlier algebra classes. :(

I have posted a link there so the OP can view my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Vi3nc6en0t,

We are given to evaluate:

$$\int\frac{x^5+2x^3-3x}{\left(x^2+1 \right)^3}\,dx$$

First, we observe that the numerator of the integrand can be factored:

$$x^5+2x^3-3x=x\left(x^4+2x^2-3 \right)=x\left(x^2+3 \right)\left(x^2-1 \right)=x(x+1)(x-1)\left(x^2+3 \right)$$

Thus, there are no common factors to divide out. To complete the partial fraction decomposition, we observe that an integrand with a repeated quadratic factor will decompose as follows:

$$\frac{P(x)}{\left(ax^2+bx+c \right)^n}=\sum_{k=1}^n\left(\frac{A_kx+B_k}{\left(ax^2+bx+c \right)^k} \right)$$

Thus, for the given integrand, we may write:

$$\frac{x^5+2x^3-3x}{\left(x^2+1 \right)^3}=\frac{Ax+B}{x^2+1}+\frac{Cx+D}{\left(x^2+1 \right)^2}+\frac{Ex+F}{\left(x^2+1 \right)^3}$$

Multiplying through by $$\left(x^2+1 \right)^3$$, we obtain:

$$x^5+2x^3-3x=(Ax+B)\left(x^2+1 \right)^2+(Cx+D)\left(x^2+1 \right)+(Ex+F)$$

Expanding the right side and arranging on like powers of $x$, we obtain:

$$x^5+2x^3-3x=Ax^5+Bx^4+(2A+C)x^3+(2B+D)x^2+(A+C+E)x+(B+D+F)$$

Equating corresponding coefficients, we obtain the system:

$$A=1$$

$$B=0$$

$$2A+C=2\implies C=0$$

$$2B+D=0\implies D=0$$

$$A+C+E=-3\implies E=-4$$

$$B+D+F=0\implies F=0$$

Thus, we may state:

$$\frac{x^5+2x^3-3x}{\left(x^2+1 \right)^3}=\frac{x}{x^2+1}-\frac{4x}{\left(x^2+1 \right)^3}$$

Now, in order to integrate, let's write:

$$\int\frac{x^5+2x^3-3x}{\left(x^2+1 \right)^3}\,dx=\frac{1}{2}\int\frac{2x}{x^2+1}\,dx-2\int\frac{2x}{\left(x^2+1 \right)^3}\,dx$$

For both integrals, consider the substitution:

$$u=x^2+1\,\therefore\,du=2x\,dx$$

And we may now write:

$$\int\frac{x^5+2x^3-3x}{\left(x^2+1 \right)^3}\,dx=\frac{1}{2}\int\frac{1}{u}\,du-2\int u^{-3}\,du$$

Applying the rules of integration, we obtain:

$$\int\frac{x^5+2x^3-3x}{\left(x^2+1 \right)^3}\,dx=\frac{1}{2}\ln|u|-2\frac{u^{-2}}{-2}+C$$

Back substituting for $u$, and applying the property of logs that a coefficient may be taken inside as an exponent we have:

$$\int\frac{x^5+2x^3-3x}{\left(x^2+1 \right)^3}\,dx=\ln\left(\sqrt{x^2+1} \right)+\frac{1}{\left(x^2+1 \right)^2}+C$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top