Integration in two different coordinate systems

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the integration of functions defined in two different coordinate systems, specifically examining the relationship between the integrals obtained in each system and the implications of changing coordinate systems on integration limits and constants. The scope includes mathematical reasoning and conceptual clarification regarding integration techniques.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion over the integration results in two coordinate systems, noting that the integrals do not yield the same results despite the functions being equivalent.
  • Another participant suggests that the difference in results is due to the reversal of the integration direction when switching coordinate systems, implying that this affects the sign of the integral.
  • A later reply emphasizes the importance of boundary conditions and how they influence the constants of integration, indicating that different limits must be considered when changing coordinates.
  • Another participant reiterates the need for a negative sign in front of the integral when switching between coordinate systems due to the reversal of the integration range.
  • One participant highlights that the constants of integration account for more than just the difference in limits, suggesting that the limits must change with the coordinate system.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of changing coordinate systems on integration, particularly regarding the treatment of constants and limits. There is no consensus on a single resolution to the initial confusion presented.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on the definitions of the coordinate systems and the assumptions made regarding the limits of integration and constants. The discussion does not resolve these issues.

Undoubtedly0
Messages
98
Reaction score
0
Hi all. I am very puzzled by the following.

Let [itex]x_1[/itex] and [itex]x_2[/itex] be two coordinate systems related by [itex]x_1=1-x_2[/itex].

Now if [itex]y(x_1) = x_1[/itex] and [itex]z(x_2) = 1-x_2[/itex], then clearly [itex]y(x_1)=z(x_2)[/itex].

Now integrating the function in each coordinate system gives

[tex]Y(x_1) = \int y(x_1) dx_1 = \int x_1 dx_1 = \frac{x_1^2}{2} + C[/tex]

[tex]Z(x_2) = \int z(x_2) dx_2 = \int (1-x_2) dx_2 = -\frac{x_2^2}{2} + x_2 + D[/tex]

Now, however,

[tex]Y(x_1) = Y(1-x_2) = \frac{(1-x_2)^2}{2} + C = \frac{1}{2} - x_2 + \frac{x_2^2}{2} + C \neq Z(x_2)[/tex]

In words, [itex]Y(x_1) \neq Z(x_2)[/itex] regardless of the values of [itex]C[/itex] and [itex]D[/itex]. One would expect, however that [itex]Y(x_1) = Z(x_2)[/itex] - but then where was my mistake? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since any difference in the constant term is explained away by 'constant of integration', the remaining puzzle is the reversal of the sign. This is simply because the integral wrt x2 ran in the opposite direction, right-to-left, so to speak. So the integration range was reversed.
 
haruspex said:
Since any difference in the constant term is explained away by 'constant of integration', the remaining puzzle is the reversal of the sign. This is simply because the integral wrt x2 ran in the opposite direction, right-to-left, so to speak. So the integration range was reversed.

Let me try to highlight the problem. Say that you know boundary condition [itex]Y(x_1=0) = 0[/itex] (and hence [itex]Y(x_2=1)=0[/itex]). This means that [itex]C=0[/itex] and [itex]D=-\frac{1}{2}[/itex].

Now let us say we want to evaluate the integral of [itex]y[/itex] at [itex]x_1=1[/itex] ([itex]x_2=0[/itex]). We should be able to do this in either coordinate system, but

[tex]Y(x_1=1) = \frac{1}{2}[/tex]
[tex]Z(x_2=0) = -\frac{0}{2} + 0 + \frac{-1}{2} = -\frac{1}{2} \neq Y(x_1=1)[/tex]
 
It makes sense, if you think about how the functions relate. Just some example:

Let x_1 = 0, x_2 = 1, x_1 = 1, x_2 = 0, x_1 = 2,x_2 = -1, and so on and so forth.

What this tells me is that you actually need to put a negative sign in front of the integral when you switch from one to another due to the fact that the integration range reverses. Hopes this help.
 
The error is a result of the implied assumption that the limits are the same from the constant of integration.. this isn't true. Limits must change with the coordinate system. The constant of integration accounts for more than you would think.Imagine integrating over [itex]x_1 \in (a,b)[/itex]

the integrals are equivalent...

[itex]\int_a^bx_1dx_1 \Leftrightarrow \int_{1-a}^{1-b}(1-x_2)dx_2[/itex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K