Integration of abs(k)e^(ikx)dk

  • Thread starter Thread starter rmiller70015
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the integration of the expression abs(k)e^(ikx)dk, specifically addressing the splitting of the integral and the application of boundary conditions. Participants emphasize the importance of correctly handling the absolute value in the integral by integrating from -a to +a rather than from 0 to a. The final expression simplifies to a combination of trigonometric and exponential functions, showcasing the use of Euler's formula. The conversation also highlights the necessity of understanding Fourier Transforms in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fourier Transforms (FT)
  • Familiarity with complex exponential functions
  • Knowledge of boundary conditions in integrals
  • Proficiency in using Mathematica for integral evaluation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Fourier Transforms and their applications
  • Learn about the use of Euler's formula in complex analysis
  • Explore the implications of boundary conditions in integral calculus
  • Practice evaluating integrals using Mathematica, focusing on the InverseFourierTransform function
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers working with Fourier analysis, integral calculus, and complex functions will benefit from this discussion.

rmiller70015
Messages
110
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
This is for a quantum free particle problem, doing the Fourrier transform and I just want to make sure I've got the integral correct.
Relevant Equations
$$\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int^{\infty}_{-\infty} \phi (k) e^{ikx}dk$$


Where ##\phi## is:
$$

f\left(k\right) = \left\{

\begin{array}{lr}

A(a-|k|) & : |k| \le a\\

0 & : |k| > a

\end{array}

\right.\\

$$
Split the integral
$$\frac{Aa}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int^{\infty}_{-\infty}e^{ikx}dk - \frac{A}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int^{\infty}_{-\infty}|k|e^{ikx}dk$$

Apply the boundary conditions, this is where my biggest source of uncertainty comes from I doubled the integral and integrated from 0 to a instead of from -a to +a to get rid of that absolute value. I plotted the |k|e^k function and it appears to have even parity.

$$\frac{Aa}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int^{a}_{-a}e^{ikx}dk - \frac{2A}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int^{a}_{0}|k|e^{ikx}dk$$

$$\frac{Aa}{\sqrt{2\pi}ix}(e^{iax} - e^{-iax}) + \frac{2Ai}{\sqrt{2\pi}x}[ke^{ikx}-\frac{1}{ix}e^{ikx}]^a_0$$

$$\frac{Aa}{\sqrt{2\pi}ix}(e^{iax} - e^{-iax}) - \frac{2A}{\sqrt{2\pi}ix}(ae^{iax}-0 - \frac{1}{ix}(e^{iax}-1))$$

$$\frac{Aa}{\sqrt{2\pi}ix}(e^{iax}-e^{-iax}-2e^{iax}) - \frac{2A}{\sqrt{2\pi}(ix)^2}(e^{iax}-1)$$

Clean up and use Euler
$$\frac{2iAa}{\sqrt{2\pi}x}cos(ax) + \frac{2A}{\sqrt{2\pi}x^2}(e^{iax}-1)$$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

rmiller70015 said:
Apply the boundary conditions, this is where my biggest source of uncertainty comes from I doubled the integral and integrated from 0 to a instead of from -a to +a to get rid of that absolute value
If you have to split anyway, why not write ##\phi = a+k ## from -a to 0 and ##\phi = a-k ## from 0 to a ?

Are you somewhat familiar with the FT ? Since your ##\phi## is a convolution of a boxcar in time (6) with itself, I would expect (14) something like a ##\displaystyle {\ {sin^2 x\over x^2}}\ ## for ##\psi ##.

##\ ##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: docnet
Mathematica yields a simpler result (this one's wrong):
$$\frac{2A}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \frac{1-e^{iax}+iax}{x^2}.$$ On the other hand, if I evaluate the integral using the InverseFourierTransform function, I get a result like @BvU's expectation.

You can't double the integral from 0 to ##a## because while ##f(k)## is even, the integrand as a whole isn't.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: docnet

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K