Intel drops Science Talent Search

  • Thread starter Thread starter berkeman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Science Search
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around Intel's decision to drop its sponsorship of the Science Talent Search, a program it has supported for 20 years. Participants explore the implications of this decision, potential motivations behind it, and the future of corporate sponsorship in STEM initiatives.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express disappointment over Intel's decision, hoping another corporate sponsor will take over the program.
  • Concerns are raised about the reasoning behind Intel's withdrawal, with some questioning the validity of the statement "time for the company to move on."
  • One participant suggests that the corporate legal department's focus on Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) costs may be influencing the decision.
  • Another participant references an article indicating that Intel plans to redirect funds towards improving racial and gender diversity in its workforce, suggesting a shift in corporate priorities.
  • There is a discussion about the potential downsides of focusing on diversity initiatives at the expense of recruiting the best talent, with suggestions for alternative approaches like blind hiring.
  • Some participants speculate that Intel's strategic decisions, including the need to adapt to a changing market, may be influencing its sponsorship choices.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on the motivations behind Intel's decision, with multiple competing views on the implications of the sponsorship withdrawal and the company's future direction. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to corporate sponsorship in STEM.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the connection between EEO rules and the sponsorship decision, and there are unresolved questions about the balance between diversity initiatives and talent recruitment strategies.

berkeman
Admin
Messages
69,523
Reaction score
25,100
This is bad news, but hopefully some other good corporate sponsor will pick up the ball... I've been to a couple of these STEM fairs in the past (as an observer), and the breadth and quality of many of the projects is truly amazing...

http://money.cnn.com/2015/09/09/tec....html?iid=ob_homepage_tech_pool&iid=obnetwork
.
The chipmaker said it will drop the sponsorship in April 2017, 20 years after it began. It's time for the company to move on, said Intel spokesperson Gail Dundas.

"That's a fairly long corporate sponsorship," she said. "We've greatly increased the prize money. It's been a great opportunity for Intel and a great partnership, and now someone else can get that opportunity."
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
"Time for the company to move on" is not a reason. Wonder what the real one is.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Greg Bernhardt said:
"Time for the company to move on" is not a reason. Wonder what the real one is.
What a nasty, suspicious mind --- like mine --- corporate legal dept. started adding up EEO costs.
 
Bystander said:
What a nasty, suspicious mind --- like mine --- corporate legal dept. started adding up EEO costs.

Interesting. What do Equal Employment Opportunity rules have to do with Intel's sponsorship of the competition? I'm not making the connection...
 
Greg Bernhardt said:
"Time for the company to move on" is not a reason. Wonder what the real one is.
This article in Slate indicates that Intel wants to spend millions of dollars for "improving racial and gender diversity in its workforce."

http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_t...r_science_talent_search_starting_in_2018.html

Seems like Intel is now focused more on satisfying the HR Gremlins rather than recruiting the best talent.
 
Ah, that makes more sense now. Thanks @SteamKing :smile:
 
SteamKing said:
This article in Slate indicates that Intel wants to spend millions of dollars for "improving racial and gender diversity in its workforce."

http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_t...r_science_talent_search_starting_in_2018.html

Seems like Intel is now focused more on satisfying the HR Gremlins rather than recruiting the best talent.

The purpose is generally to reduce biases that favor like hires (that may themselves lead to talent loss). Their heart is in the right place, but a better approach would be blind hiring (as opposed to enforcing a particular racial/gender ratio).
 
SteamKing said:
spend millions of dollars for "improving racial and gender diversity in its workforce."
That's admirable, but why not in conjunction with the Intel Science Talent Search?
 
Astronuc said:
That's admirable, but why not in conjunction with the Intel Science Talent Search?
There's only so many dollars to go around. Intel is reportedly committed to spending $300 million on its workforce diversity program.

Intel has sponsored the Talent Search since about 1998 and they feel, for better or worse, that it's time for another corporate sponsor to pick up the torch, so to speak.

With the new spin-off at HP coming, 30,000 people will soon be hitting the streets. The PC market has matured and stabilized, but Intel has not made much headway in creating products for new markets, like mobile devices. Things might appear to be going well right now for Intel, but perhaps the company is making some strategic decisions for the future, and the Talent Search sponsorship gets the chop now.
 

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K