Intelligent life other than on Earth

In summary: developed...intelligent behavior which allows them to survive and reproduce beyond their physical abilities.

Intelligent life exists elsewhere in the Universe?

  • Certain.

    Votes: 9 26.5%
  • Very Likely

    Votes: 8 23.5%
  • Likely but not near Earth

    Votes: 10 29.4%
  • Unlikely

    Votes: 2 5.9%
  • Possible

    Votes: 3 8.8%
  • Impossible

    Votes: 2 5.9%

  • Total voters
    34
  • #1
rootone
3,395
946
What do you think?
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
  • #2
rootone said:
What do you think?

There must be life other than on Earth, because the universe is so huge and there are so many possibilities of it existing in all these possible places. What if what happened on Earth happened somewhere else for life to exist there too? Life must exist somewhere.
 
  • #3
I voted very likely because in my opinion I don't think galaxies and solar systems are just lifeless I just don't believe it, we also just recently found that 70% of stars have orbiting planets around them.

In my opinion from watching the processes on Earth of how nature behaves and spends its energy it is very efficient on how it does it there isn't any waste and I think the same processes could be said for galaxies and solar systems and everything else in the universe (this is of course just my beliefs).

Sort of like how a plant grows it starts as a seed then blooms and releases there seeds, most of them survive and a few don't make it.

Also "intelligent" is sort of misleading I think because everything is intelligent in some way if you take the definition of intelligent from wikipedia - "It can be more generally described as the ability or inclination to perceive or deduce information, and to retain it as knowledge to be applied towards adaptive behaviors within an environment or context."

So if we find life on another planet for example some kind of fish, it doesn't have anything in common with us does that mean it isn't intelligent? I think what a lot of people think of as intelligent life is some kind of civilization or being that is technologically advanced, space ships etc... so really what we would be looking for is just something that is similar and common to us in those ways and we would call them intelligent.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
I voted "Very Likely" simply based on the number of galaxies in the observable universe, and the fact that intelligent life evolved here. Simple as that. :biggrin:
 
  • #5
I voted "Likely but not near Earth" for the simple reason that as far as the evidence we have thus far, we have not observed any evidence of life on any planets within our existing solar system; however, as others have stated, the universe is massive, and there is evidence of solar systems with planets similar in composition to Earth, which thus increases the probability of life on Earth. If such life exists, then through convergent evolution there would likely also be "intelligent" life on Earth, with the caveat of how we define "intelligence" (after all, one could argue that a dolphin or a chimpanzee could be considered intelligent life, depending on the criteria of what we define as intelligence).
 
  • #6
Cool question poll!
I voted "Likely but not near Earth", but what "not near Earth" is, is a little ambiguous. My current opinion is that I don't think there is life elsewhere in our Solar System, judging from the lack of evidence at the moment.

EDIT: Oh, sorry, I missed the term "intelligent" in the title. "Intelligent" is also a bit ambiguous. What is intelligent life? Surviving? Spreading life? Communicating with other organisms? Thinking thoughts? Planning things? Building things? etc.
 
Last edited:
  • #7
Considering the vast numbers of galaxies, stars, stars with planets, and what I think is the likelihood of life evolving on planets with the acceptable conditions, I consider life in the universe outside of Earth to be a certainty.

I would also think it very likely that intelligent life would form in a large, long lasting, diverse ecology that also experiences periodic large variations (such as extinction of events) forcing/allowing organisms to adapt to new conditions periodically.
I see disrupted situations like that as places where life could grab an advantage by developing increased intelligence over the pre-existing physically well adapted species.
Among the vast numbers of opportunities, this will happen somewhere (many times).
 
  • #8
I voted "possible". We know intelligent life is possible in the universe as we are living proof. But since we are the only known case, we have too small a sample to provide us with any indication of how likely this is to occur in the universe.
 
  • Like
Likes 256bits and jim hardy
  • #9
I think no amount of voting will convert the absence of information into information. We simply don't know, and nobody's opinion really matters. We need hard data. Yes the universe is huge, but we have no idea what the probability of intelligent life occurring really is. Maybe it is so small that we are the only example.
 
  • Like
Likes 256bits
  • #10
DennisN said:
"not near Earth" is, is a little ambiguous.
"Intelligent" is also a bit ambiguous.
By not near Earth, I meant outside of a distance we could reasonably hope to communicate with it, say 50ly.
What I meant by intelligent was organisms which don't just eat other organisms, but have some kind of civilization and technology.
 
  • #11
I voted "likely" because history has shown us that it's not wise to believe we are something special e.g. that the Earth is at the center of the universe. Also because of the large number of stars in the universe. But maybe I've watched too much Star Trek.
 
  • #12
I voted certainly, because I thought of the extremely high chances of the chemical and biological processes that happened on Earth happening somewhere else as well.
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre
  • #13
There has to be intelligent life SOMEWHERE.
 
  • #14
LBNNE, here as well.
---
On a related note, has anyone else read the Wired article on dissipation-driven adaptation?
It seemed reasonable to me, but I can't consider that a good measure of the worth of the article.
They call it controversial in the title, but that wasn't evident to me in the text.
Thoughts?
 
  • #15
Ivan Samsonov said:
I voted certainly, because I thought of the extremely high chances of the chemical and biological processes that happened on Earth happening somewhere else as well.

You have no idea what those chances are, and neither does anyone else.

Noisy Rhysling said:
There has to be intelligent life SOMEWHERE.

No, there doesn't. This is just wishful thinking on your part. We simply don't know.
 
  • #16
phyzguy said:
You have no idea what those chances are, and neither does anyone else.
No, there doesn't. This is just wishful thinking on your part. We simply don't know.
Missed the sarcasm I see.
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre
  • #17
Noisy Rhysling said:
Missed the sarcasm I see.

Guess so. Sorry.
 
  • #18
phyzguy said:
Guess so. Sorry.
As Calvin said, "The surest sign of intelligent life in the universe is that they haven't visited Earth."
 
  • Like
Likes DennisN and BillTre
  • #19
phyzguy said:
I think no amount of voting will convert the absence of information into information. We simply don't know, and nobody's opinion really matters. We need hard data. Yes the universe is huge, but we have no idea what the probability of intelligent life occurring really is. Maybe it is so small that we are the only example.

If life has occurred once (on Earth), than it has a non-zero probability.

Ignoring all of the results on the chemical feasibility of steps leading to the presumed origin of life (which is some relevant information), it seems to me rather arrogant and presumptuous to think that only on Earth would this happen in so vast a universe that some think it is infinite (of course that is another subject upon which direct knowledge is lacking).

Furthermore, one could make the same kind of argument that life on Earth did not evolve in a naturalistic (chemistry/physics based) manner (lacking direct evidence) and was "created" in some other manner.
A chemical/physical origin of life is another thing I would claim certainty on.
 
  • #20
phyzguy said:
I think no amount of voting will convert the absence of information into information. We simply don't know, and nobody's opinion really matters. We need hard data. Yes the universe is huge, but we have no idea what the probability of intelligent life occurring really is. Maybe it is so small that we are the only example.
I see where you are coming from here, but I think you might be underestimating what we can learn from a sample size of one. Henry Reich has a nice video that shows the use of statistical inference to make predictions about alien life.
 
  • #21
Noisy Rhysling said:
As Calvin said, "The surest sign of intelligent life in the universe is that they haven't visited Earth."

Why?
 
  • #22
I got the one "Unlikely" vote and would add "but irrelevant", because the incredible distances between star systems with populated habitable zones make communication and travel terribly impractical without exotic sci-fi technologies. My theory is the longer SETI goes without detection, the farther out (radially) the likelihood of advanced beings gets.

BillTre said:
If life has occurred once (on Earth), than it has a non-zero probability.
This non-zero probability is what concerns those who think life may be an illusion, or Boltzmann brain (which I favor over naturalism). I think ultimately we choose to accept being a product of choice or entropy, but they can't both be true.
 
Last edited:
  • #23
the intelligent life maybe in a form that is not detectable by our 5 senses.maybe gas clouds on some planet are livng creatures but we don't think that they are living .
Also maybe the probability of forming life might be so less that it only happened once and won't happen again.
 
  • Like
Likes ISamson
  • #24
Ivan Samsonov said:
Why?
Seriously?
 
  • #25
Suyash Singh said:
the intelligent life maybe in a form that is not detectable by our 5 senses.maybe gas clouds on some planet are livng creatures but we don't think that they are living .
Also maybe the probability of forming life might be so less that it only happened once and won't happen again.
I read a story back in the '60s about radon on Venus being intelligent.
 
  • #26
  • #27
  • Like
Likes Noisy Rhysling, ISamson and stoomart
  • #28
ok what i am saying now i read somewhere but are not my ideas,
1.earth might be unique thus the only planet with intelligent life
2.earth is not unique and there are multiple "Earth's" so aliens have no reason to visit Earth particularly
3.aliens are not curious like us
4.we are just undeveloped bacteria for aliens.
5.all types of aliens are also undeveloped like us so no one has an spaceship.
 
  • Like
Likes ISamson
  • #29
Suyash Singh said:
ok what i am saying now i read somewhere but are not my ideas,
1.earth might be unique thus the only planet with intelligent life
2.earth is not unique and there are multiple "Earth's" so aliens have no reason to visit Earth particularly
3.aliens are not curious like us
4.we are just undeveloped bacteria for aliens.
5.all types of aliens are also undeveloped like us so no one has an spaceship.
2. sounds most likely to me. Give us a few thousand years to get a civilization and some maturity...
 
  • Like
Likes ISamson
  • #30
Certain that intelligent life has existed in at least 2 locations during the entire history of the universe... If the Earth is the only host for intelligent life in all of history and it turns out it's cyclic, even then we can be certain that it also occurs at least twice with an infinite number of cycles.
 
  • Like
Likes ISamson
  • #31
Fervent Freyja said:
Certain that intelligent life has existed in at least 2 locations during the entire history of the universe... If the Earth is the only host for intelligent life in all of history and it turns out it's cyclic, even then we can be certain that it also occurs at least twice with an infinite number of cycles.
I don't think I understand what you mean here, but the wording reminds me of an article I read that applied the Zero-One-Infinity rule to astrobiology. I think it was in Time, but all I could find was this blog post that talks about the article.

Sciency Words said:
Zero-One-Infinity in Astrobiology

Applying the zero-one-infinity rule to the search for alien life is, in my opinion, brilliant. How many locations in the universe can support life? There are really only three answers:

  • Life cannot exist anywhere in the universe (zero).
  • Life can exist only on Earth; Earth is a very special exception in a universe where life is otherwise not allowed (one).
  • Life can exist in an unlimited number of locations in the universe (infinity).
We already know the zero proposition is false.

There was a time (I remember it well) when many a scientist argued that Earth must be an exception: the one and only place in the universe where life could exist. Occasionally, I still hear people try to argue this.

All it would take is to find a second life-bearing world to prove the one proposition wrong (I’m looking at you, Europa). Because once we know about two living worlds, how could anyone argue that there can’t be three? Or four? Or thirty-eight? Or however many the universe feels like having?

Is that what you were trying to express?
 
  • #32
Intelligent life on Earth? Some people agree with the last few lines of

 
  • Like
Likes BillTre
  • #33
Fervent Freyja said:
Certain that intelligent life has existed in at least 2 locations during the entire history of the universe... If the Earth is the only host for intelligent life in all of history and it turns out it's cyclic, even then we can be certain that it also occurs at least twice with an infinite number of cycles.
"...at least 2 locations during the entire history of the universe..."

Los Angeles and New York?
 
  • #34
Noisy Rhysling said:
"...at least 2 locations during the entire history of the universe..."

Los Angeles and New York?

I refuse to believe that the molecular complexity which drove the formation of intelligent life at Earth hasn't, doesn't, or won't exist in numerous locations elsewhere. The Earth cannot be the most special place in the universe- that's old school logic! I have found no evidence that suggests Earth is some sort of preferred location in the universe. Okay, I better stop before my nihilistic thinking gets me into trouble on here... :devil:
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre and MarkFL
  • #35
Fervent Freyja said:
The Earth cannot be the most special place in the universe- that's old school logic!
I'd say ideas like flat Earth and Earth as the center of the solar system or universe are old school logic, but choosing between naturalism and creationism is more of a philosphical preference.
 
<h2>1. Is there any evidence of intelligent life on other planets?</h2><p>Currently, there is no definitive evidence of intelligent life on other planets. However, there have been numerous sightings and reports of unidentified flying objects (UFOs) and unexplained phenomena that suggest the possibility of intelligent life beyond Earth.</p><h2>2. What are the chances of finding intelligent life elsewhere in the universe?</h2><p>The chances of finding intelligent life elsewhere in the universe are difficult to determine. Some scientists believe that the universe is so vast that it is highly likely that there is intelligent life on other planets. Others argue that the conditions necessary for intelligent life to evolve are so specific that it may be rare.</p><h2>3. How would we communicate with intelligent life on other planets?</h2><p>Communicating with intelligent life on other planets would require advanced technology and a common language or method of communication. Scientists have developed methods such as the SETI (Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence) program to listen for radio signals from other civilizations, but it is still uncertain if we would be able to understand and interpret any potential messages.</p><h2>4. What would be the impact of discovering intelligent life on other planets?</h2><p>The impact of discovering intelligent life on other planets would be significant. It could potentially change our understanding of the universe and our place in it. It could also have major societal, cultural, and technological implications. Additionally, it could lead to new collaborations and advancements in science and technology.</p><h2>5. How do scientists search for intelligent life on other planets?</h2><p>Scientists use a variety of methods to search for intelligent life on other planets. These include listening for radio signals, searching for biosignatures (evidence of life) on other planets, and analyzing data from space telescopes. Scientists also study the conditions and environments of other planets to determine if they could support life as we know it.</p>

1. Is there any evidence of intelligent life on other planets?

Currently, there is no definitive evidence of intelligent life on other planets. However, there have been numerous sightings and reports of unidentified flying objects (UFOs) and unexplained phenomena that suggest the possibility of intelligent life beyond Earth.

2. What are the chances of finding intelligent life elsewhere in the universe?

The chances of finding intelligent life elsewhere in the universe are difficult to determine. Some scientists believe that the universe is so vast that it is highly likely that there is intelligent life on other planets. Others argue that the conditions necessary for intelligent life to evolve are so specific that it may be rare.

3. How would we communicate with intelligent life on other planets?

Communicating with intelligent life on other planets would require advanced technology and a common language or method of communication. Scientists have developed methods such as the SETI (Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence) program to listen for radio signals from other civilizations, but it is still uncertain if we would be able to understand and interpret any potential messages.

4. What would be the impact of discovering intelligent life on other planets?

The impact of discovering intelligent life on other planets would be significant. It could potentially change our understanding of the universe and our place in it. It could also have major societal, cultural, and technological implications. Additionally, it could lead to new collaborations and advancements in science and technology.

5. How do scientists search for intelligent life on other planets?

Scientists use a variety of methods to search for intelligent life on other planets. These include listening for radio signals, searching for biosignatures (evidence of life) on other planets, and analyzing data from space telescopes. Scientists also study the conditions and environments of other planets to determine if they could support life as we know it.

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
1
Views
649
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
60
Views
3K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
837
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Earth Sciences
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
15
Views
1K
Back
Top