member 731016
Oh wait, I think the OpenStax textbook just assumed an efficiency equal to 1.
Many thanks!
Many thanks!
The discussion revolves around graphing power versus polarizer angle using intensity measurements from an experiment involving a laser and polarizers. Participants are exploring how to derive transmitted power from recorded intensity values, which are measured in lux, and are questioning the relationship between intensity and power in this context.
The conversation is ongoing, with participants sharing data and clarifying their understanding of the relationships between intensity, power, and polarizer angles. Some participants have provided guidance on how to approach the graphing of power versus polarizer angle, while others are still questioning the assumptions and definitions involved in their calculations.
There are constraints regarding the availability of certain measurements, such as the area of the polarizer and the maximum power of the laser, which are affecting the ability to graph power versus polarizer angle accurately. Participants are also addressing potential errors in their data collection and the definitions of the angles involved in the experiment.
Thank you for doing that @haruspex!haruspex said:I plotted your data. Normally, one assumes the x values are reliable, so curve fitting minimises the sum of squares of the errors in y, but your data looks very odd. The trough on the left is about 112° wide, then the crest is only 68° wide. It's as though there is some systematic error in the angle readings.
Alternatively, the high crest on the right is what's wrong. If we throw away the data from 120° to 170° then the curve looks respectable. Sketching in the gap created, the peak would only be about 130.
I assume you only did one run-through of the settings, which is a shame.
Anyway, I was able to verify my formulae.