1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Intensity, frequency and amplitude

  1. Feb 3, 2014 #1

    MohammedRady

    User Avatar

    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    A wave has an amplitude a1, intensity I, and frequency f. A second wave of the same type has twice the intensity and double the frequency, find the amplitude of the second wave in terms of a1.

    2. Relevant equations

    Using the relationship I=k a2f2, where k is a constant:

    3. The attempt at a solution
    [itex]\frac{I}{a12f2}[/itex] = [itex]\frac{2I}{a22(0.5f)2}[/itex]
    So a2 = √8 a1


    But according to my answer key, the answer is √2 a1
     
    MohammedRady, Feb 3, 2014
  2. jcsd
    Phys.org - latest science and technology news stories on Phys.org
  3. Feb 3, 2014 #2

    BvU

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Well, what did you do with "double the frequency" ?


    TeX tips: within [itex] [ [/itex] itex [itex] ] [/itex] ... [itex] [ [/itex] /itex [itex] ] [/itex] a subscript is done using _ and a superscript is done using ^
    so [itex] [ [/itex] itex [itex] ] [/itex] a^2_\epsilon [itex] [ [/itex] /itex [itex] ] [/itex] gives ##a^2_\epsilon ##
     
    Last edited: Feb 3, 2014
    BvU, Feb 3, 2014
  4. Feb 4, 2014 #3

    MohammedRady

    User Avatar

    I'm so sorry! I meant the frequency is halved.
     
    MohammedRady, Feb 4, 2014
  5. Feb 4, 2014 #4

    MohammedRady

    User Avatar

    I meant to say that the frequency is halved, can you look into it again?
     
    MohammedRady, Feb 4, 2014
  6. Feb 4, 2014 #5

    BvU

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Well, if the intensity isn't also halved, I agree with your a2 = √8 a1. Can't find a way to dismiss the relationship you're using. So, I'm puzzled.
     
    BvU, Feb 4, 2014
  7. Feb 5, 2014 #6

    MohammedRady

    User Avatar

    What I mean to say is, is the relationship between I a and f valid? Or is intensity just proportional to the square of the amplitude?
     
    MohammedRady, Feb 5, 2014
  8. Feb 6, 2014 #7

    BvU

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    The latter could be quite right. I've seen it come by while googling around. But your orginal formula as well. Is there something in the context that can help you on your way (except for the answer that indeed points to I ##\propto## amplitude2) ? What is the subject of the chapter at hand ?
     
    BvU, Feb 6, 2014
  9. Feb 6, 2014 #8

    MohammedRady

    User Avatar

    It is on the basic properties of waves in general, and the question did not specify the type of wave.
     
    MohammedRady, Feb 6, 2014
  10. Feb 6, 2014 #9

    BvU

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Well, then the caveat is we've done it for e.g. electromagnetic waves. Sound or springs have I ##\propto \omega^2 ## amplitude2 as you wrote.

    Anyone else have an idea here ? I'm at a loss.
     
    BvU, Feb 6, 2014
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Intensity, frequency and amplitude

  1. Amplitude and Frequency (Replies: 1)

  2. Amplitude and intensity (Replies: 2)

  3. Amplitude of light and intensity (Replies: 1)

  4. Amplitude Squared Proportional to Intensity? (Replies: 1)

  5. Intensity and amplitude (Replies: 4)

Loading...