Intensity of central maxima of crystal diffraction

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The intensity at the central maximum of a crystal diffraction pattern illuminated with light of intensity I0 is calculated to be (5/16)2 I0. This result is derived from diffraction theory, where the intensity is proportional to the square of the number of coherent sources, N, and the solid angle of the diffraction maximum is inversely proportional to N. The analysis employs Fraunhofer diffraction theory, integrating the complex amplitude over the aperture to arrive at the final intensity expression.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fraunhofer diffraction theory
  • Knowledge of complex amplitude and its relation to intensity
  • Familiarity with the concept of coherent sources in wave physics
  • Basic principles of Fourier transforms in optics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of Fraunhofer diffraction in greater detail
  • Learn about the Fourier transform and its applications in optics
  • Explore the relationship between electric field amplitude and intensity in wave phenomena
  • Investigate the effects of source arrangement on diffraction patterns
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, optical engineers, and students studying wave optics, particularly those focusing on diffraction phenomena and crystal optics.

phantomvommand
Messages
287
Reaction score
39
Homework Statement
Please see attached photo.
Relevant Equations
Intensity proportional to Amplitude of E-field squared.
Screenshot 2021-05-12 at 2.52.02 AM.png

When the crystal above is illuminated with light of intensity ##I_0##, what is the intensity at the central maximum? (The picture shown above is a 4 x 4 unit cell of the crystal)
The answer is ##(\frac {5} {16} )^2 I_0##. Why?

Apparently, Electric field is proportional to the transparent area, and will be maximum if the whole unit cell is transparent. I feel that it should be intensity that's proportional to the transparent area instead?
I cannot see how amplitude of electric field is related to transparent squares.

Thanks for all the help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
From diffraction theory, the intensity of the primary maxima for ##N ## sources (in phase), (or for a single slit diffraction pattern made from ## N ## sources), is proportional to ## N^2 ##, because the resultant electric field amplitude ## E ## is proportional to ## N ##. The reason energy is conserved is that for ## N ## sources, the angular width of the diffraction pattern (central maximum) ## \Delta \theta \approx \frac{\lambda}{b} ##, where ## b ## is the width of the ## N ## sources, (e.g. arranged in a square), so that the solid angle of the maximum, which is proportional to ## (\Delta \theta )^2 ##, is inversely proportional to the total area of the sources. Thereby the solid angle of the diffraction maximum is inversely proportional to ## N ##. The power is a product of the intensity and the solid angle. It turns out the power in the entire maximum for ## N ## sources will be proportional to ## N ##. The peak goes as ## N^2 ##, but the solid angle spread goes as ## \frac{1}{N} ##.

Note: With circular symmetry, (with a circular source of diameter ## d ##), the ## \Delta \theta ## of the diffraction pattern, which is an Airy disc pattern, is once again proportional to ## \frac{\lambda}{d} ##, so that the solid angle of the diffraction maximum is again inversely proportional to the area of the source.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: phantomvommand and hutchphd
And the "book" answer is that the forward amplitude is proportional to the corresponding (0,0) Fourier component which is just the normalized integral. But I like the @Charles Link explanation also..

.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: phantomvommand and Charles Link
I analyze this problem using Fraunhofer diffraction theory, to whit, the complex amplitude of the diffracted wave is,
$$
U(z,y,z)\propto \int \int_{Aperture}A(x^{'},y^{'})e^{-i\frac{2\pi}{\lambda}(ux^{'}+vy^{'})}dx^{'}dy^{'}
$$
where ##A(x^{'},y^{'})## is the complex amplitude over the surface of the aperture. I wave my hand and declare the constant of proportionality is ##\sqrt{I_0}##, and refer to the diagram below for the limits of integration in the five transparent regions of the unit cell.
?hash=9843aded4cb9c8b57c2bc1a52c755410.jpg


$$
U_1= \sqrt{I_0}\int_{-\frac{1}{2}}^{-\frac{1}{4}}e^{-i\frac{2\pi}{\lambda}ux^{'}}dx^{'}\int_{-\frac{1}{2}}^{-\frac{1}{4}}e^{-i\frac{2\pi}{\lambda}vy^{'}}dy^{'}
$$
$$
=\sqrt{I_0}\frac{e^{-i\frac{2\pi}{\lambda}ux^{'}}}{-i\frac{2\pi}{\lambda}u}|_{-\frac{1}{2}}^{-\frac{1}{4}}\frac{e^{-i\frac{2\pi}{\lambda}vy^{'}}}{-i\frac{2\pi}{\lambda}v}|_{-\frac{1}{2}}^{-\frac{1}{4}}
$$
$$
=\sqrt{I_0}\frac{e^{i\frac{\pi}{4\lambda}(3u+3v)}}{16}sinc(\frac{\pi u}{4\lambda})sinc(\frac{\pi v}{4\lambda})
$$
in likewise manner we compute,
$$
U_2=\sqrt{I_0}\frac{e^{i\frac{\pi}{4\lambda}(u+v)}}{16}sinc(\frac{\pi u}{4\lambda})sinc(\frac{\pi v}{4\lambda})
$$
$$
U_3=\sqrt{I_0}\frac{e^{i\frac{\pi}{4\lambda}(u-v)}}{16}sinc(\frac{\pi u}{4\lambda})sinc(\frac{\pi v}{4\lambda})
$$
$$
U_4=\sqrt{I_0}\frac{e^{i\frac{\pi}{4\lambda}(-u+v)}}{16}sinc(\frac{\pi u}{4\lambda})sinc(\frac{\pi v}{4\lambda})
$$
$$
U_5=\sqrt{I_0}\frac{e^{i\frac{\pi}{4\lambda}(-3u-v)}}{16}sinc(\frac{\pi u}{4\lambda})sinc(\frac{\pi v}{4\lambda})
$$
We sum the individual contributions and find the intensity by taking the dot product of ##U## with its complex conjugate.
$$
U=U_1+U_2+U_3+U_4+U_5
$$
$$
I=U\cdot U^{*}
$$
$$
=\frac{I_0}{(16)^2}sinc(\frac{\pi u}{4\lambda})^2sinc(\frac{\pi v}{4\lambda})^2[5+4\cos(\frac{\pi}{2}(u+v))+2\cos(\frac{\pi}{2}(u+2v))+2\cos(\frac{\pi}{2}(2u+v))+2\cos(\frac{\pi}{2}(3u+2v))+2\cos(\frac{\pi}{2}(u))+2\cos(\frac{\pi}{2}(v))+2\cos(\frac{\pi}{2}(u-v))2\cos(\frac{\pi}{2}(4u))+2\cos(\frac{\pi}{2}(4u+2v))]

$$
We evaluate this at the center of the cell to find ##I=I_0\frac{(5)^2}{(16)^2}##.
 

Attachments

  • unitcell.jpg
    unitcell.jpg
    12.5 KB · Views: 149
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link and phantomvommand

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K