Intensity of Diffraction Pattern

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the intensity of a diffraction pattern resulting from light passing through two slits. The relevant formula combines interference and diffraction effects, with specific values provided for slit width, separation, and wavelength. A participant initially calculated an incorrect intensity value but later confirmed the correct intensity as approximately 0.17 times the central maximum intensity, I_0. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately interpreting the problem's parameters and breaking down calculations into manageable steps. Ultimately, the participants resolved the discrepancy through collaborative troubleshooting.
Stendhal
Messages
24
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


An interference pattern is produced by light with a wavelength 580 nm from a distant source incident on two identical parallel slits separated by a distance (between centers) of 0.480 mm .

Let the slits have a width 0.320 mm . In terms of the intensity I_0 at the center of the central maximum, what is the intensity at the angular position of θ_1?

Edit: Apologies in advance for the messy equation below. I'm not quite sure how to use the toolbar above for subscripts and exponents.

Homework Equations


I_1 = I_0 * cos^2((π*d*sin(θ_1) / λ)*((sin(π*a*sin(θ_1)/λ)/(π*a*sin(θ_1)/λ))^2

θ_1 = 1.21*10^-3 rad

d = .480*10^-3 m

a = .320*10^-3 m

λ = 580*10^-9 m

The Attempt at a Solution


The equation is just multiplying the interference pattern by the diffraction pattern. Mostly just plugging in the variables and then solving from there.

The answer I got was .23[/0], but that was wrong. My question is, since the original problem is stating that the distance is being measured from center, would I subtract the width a from the separation d, so that I find the actual separation between the two slits?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The distance between the slits is measured center-to-center, so you don't need to subtract the slit width.

Your formula is tricky to parse, but I think that the parentheses are unbalanced. It can be tough to keep them straight when rendering them in ascii.

Here's a screen capture of the formula in question:

upload_2016-11-28_20-43-24.png


When I plug in your given values I don't get the same result that you did. (I get a smaller value).

Try breaking your calculation up into smaller steps and present the intermediate results. Perhaps we can spot where our versions diverge.
 
Alright so I first calculated π*a*sin(θ)/λ, which I got equal to 2.097

Then I took sin(ANS)/ANS = .4122

.4122^2 = .1699

Since the interference pattern for this problem comes out to approximately 1, the final answer is:

I = .17I_0

Is that what you got?
 
Yes. That's what I got.
 
Alright, I guess there was some sort of calculator error that messed me up. Thank you for your help!
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
961
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
970
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K