Intensity of solar radiation at earth orbit

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The intensity of solar radiation at Earth's orbit is quantified as 1370 watts per meter squared, known as the solar constant. This value is derived from the power output of the Sun, calculated by dividing the solar power by the surface area of a sphere with a radius equal to the distance from the Sun to Earth. The relationship between intensity and the electric field amplitude (E_0) is expressed through the equation I = 0.5 * c * ε_0 * E^2_0, where ε_0 is the permittivity of free space (8.85 x 10^-12). Understanding these calculations is crucial for applications like solar sail dynamics and radiation pressure analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic wave theory
  • Familiarity with Poynting's vector and its average calculation
  • Knowledge of solar physics and the concept of the solar constant
  • Basic principles of classical mechanics, particularly forces and motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the solar constant and its implications in solar energy applications
  • Learn about the mathematical modeling of radiation pressure on solar sails
  • Investigate the relationship between electric field amplitude and intensity in electromagnetic waves
  • Explore the equations of motion for spacecraft under solar radiation pressure
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in astrophysics, aerospace engineering, and renewable energy sectors, particularly those interested in solar energy utilization and spacecraft dynamics.

tomelwood
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am try to understand how the value of 1370 watts per metre squared for the intensity of sunlight hitting the Earth has been derived. Is there a way to see this mathematically?


Homework Equations


I understand about how the intensity is related to Poyntings vector, by taking it's average over the wavelength (ie multiplying it by 0.5) but I don't see how this has anything to do with the radius of the orbit.


The Attempt at a Solution


The equation for I is 0.5*c*ε_0 * E^2_0 where E_0 is the amplitude of the Electric part of the EM wave, and ε_0 is the permitivity of free space 8.85*10^-12.
How do I calculate the E_0 value? And does that vary with radius? I can't imagine that it does, so I'm back to square 1! I'm trying to calculate the radiation pressure on a surface at differing distances from the sun, so knowing how and why the intensity changes would be greatly helpful
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tomelwood said:
I am try to understand how the value of 1370 watts per metre squared for the intensity of sunlight hitting the Earth has been derived. Is there a way to see this mathematically?
The solar constant is not derived. It is an observed quantity.
 
So rather than calculating the solar constant from the sun's power, rather the power of the sun is calculated from the observed solar constant. OK. I have since discovered that I can relate the power of the sun to the intensity of the sunlight passing through a sphere of radius r, simply by dividing it by the area of said sphere. I presume this is how the sun's power was calculated in the first place. If this is correct, then it should serve the purpose that I require. Hopefully!

In addition to this, I have read in a journal that the forces acting on a solar sail inclined at an angle θ to the normal are the force of gravity from the sun (Fq) (we're in free space, away from planets etc) and the force exerted by the sail perpendicular to it's surface (Fs)
This journal then constructs the equations f motion thus:
(-Fg + Fs cos θ)/m = du/dt - v^2/r ; where u is radial velocity and v is tangential velocity (making v^2/r angular velocity?) and r is distance from Sun, and m is total mass of spacecraft
and
(-Fs sin θ)/m = dv/dt + uv/r

I can't fathom how these have been arrived at. They appear to be resolving horizontally and vertically, but why is the radial component involved in the vertical resolution and vice versa?

Any hints/tips would be great, or links to other resources that explain the same thing.

Many thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
35
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K