Intensity of Spherical Shell of Stars

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the total intensity from a spherical shell of stars, where L represents the luminosity of a single star and n denotes the number density of stars. The initial calculation incorrectly defined n as the total number of stars, leading to a misunderstanding of the intensity formula. The correct intensity from the shell is given by the equation ##\frac{nL}{4π} dr##, which incorporates the density of stars rather than their total count. The confusion arose from the lack of clarity in the definition of n and its relation to the solid angle.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of stellar luminosity and its implications.
  • Familiarity with the concept of solid angles in spherical geometry.
  • Knowledge of number density in astrophysics.
  • Basic principles of intensity and power per unit area.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of solid angles in spherical coordinates.
  • Learn about Olber's Paradox and its implications in cosmology.
  • Explore the relationship between luminosity and intensity in astrophysical contexts.
  • Investigate the mathematical derivation of intensity from a distribution of stars.
USEFUL FOR

Astronomy students, astrophysicists, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of stellar intensity and the distribution of stars in space.

Kelli Van Brunt
Messages
10
Reaction score
3
TL;DR
What is the intensity of radiation at the center of a spherical shell of stars?
Given that L is the luminosity of a single star and there are n stars evenly distributed throughout this thin spherical shell of radius r with thickness dr, what is the total intensity from this shell of stars?
My calculations were as follows: Intensity is the power per unit area per steradian of the sky; the power per unit area is ##\frac {nL}{4πr^2}##; the whole sky covers a solid angle of 4π steradians; and so the intensity should be equal to ##\frac{nL}{16π^2r^2} dr##. However, my book says that the total intensity is ##\frac{nL}{4π} dr##. Can anyone help explain my mistake here? I suspect the error has to do with my lack of familiarity with a solid angle, so if that could be explained, that would be very helpful.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I think I can make a correction here, actually. My book did not define ##n## at all, but looking through later chapters it seems as though ##n## is more commonly used as a number density, rather than just the number of stars. In this case, setting n = # of stars / 4πr^2 dr would give me the same result that the book had. Sorry to inconvenience anyone with this thread, it was a misunderstanding of the variables on my part.
 
Why is there a dr in it at all? You know what it is for one star, and there are n of them.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
Why is there a dr in it at all? You know what it is for one star, and there are n of them.
For my original assumption where I defined n to be the number of stars, the dr was unnecessary, I agree. Looking back in the book, n referred to the density of stars instead (which was not explicitly stated, and that was what caused my confusion) which added a 1/dr factor that later had to be offset by tacking a dr to the end.
 
Your book is, I hope and trust, setting the stage for Olber's Paradox...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
11K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K