Intensity of unpolarized light through two polarizers

  • Thread starter Thread starter Linus Pauling
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Intensity Light
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the intensity of unpolarized light passing through two polarizers, specifically using Malus's Law. An initial intensity of 440 W/m² is reduced to 220 W/m² after the first polarizer, which is vertical. The intensity after the second polarizer, positioned at 20 degrees from vertical, is calculated incorrectly as 207 W/m². The correct approach emphasizes understanding the relationship between the electric field and intensity, focusing on ratios rather than absolute values.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Malus's Law
  • Knowledge of electric field concepts
  • Familiarity with intensity calculations in optics
  • Basic principles of polarization
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of Malus's Law
  • Explore the relationship between electric field strength and intensity in electromagnetic waves
  • Learn about the effects of multiple polarizers on light intensity
  • Investigate practical applications of polarization in optical devices
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, optical engineers, and anyone interested in the principles of light polarization and intensity calculations.

Linus Pauling
Messages
187
Reaction score
0
1. Unpolarized light with intensity 440 W/m2 passes first through a polarizing filter with its axis vertical, then through a polarizing filter with its axis 20.0 degrees from vertical.



2. Malus's Law



3. Ok, the intensity after going through the first polarizer should be 1/2 the original. This, after the second polarizer, I = 220*cos20) = 207 W/m2, which is incorrect.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The filter works by allowing only the parallel component of the electric field, E cos(theta), through. How are the electric field of the light and the intensity of the light related?
 
I = P/A = 0.5c*epsilon_0*E^2

Again, I don't see how to get I from P without knowing A.
 
You're getting too caught up in just brute force calculation when you should be focusing on how one quantity depends on another. You don't need to know P or A. Think ratios.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K