How Does Dipole Interaction Energy Vary with Orientation?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the variation of dipole interaction energy with orientation, specifically for electric dipoles. The interaction energy is defined by the equation Uint = 1/(4πε0r3)[p1·p2 - 3(p1·r)(p2·r)]. The participants discuss the graphical representation of this energy for two cases: when dipole p1 is parallel to the vector r and when it is perpendicular. The need for clarity in mathematical notation, particularly through LaTeX formatting, is also emphasized.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric dipoles and their properties
  • Familiarity with vector mathematics and dot products
  • Knowledge of the concept of interaction energy in physics
  • Basic proficiency in LaTeX for mathematical expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the graphical representation of dipole interaction energy as a function of angle (U(θ))
  • Learn how to use LaTeX for formatting mathematical equations
  • Explore the implications of dipole orientation on interaction energy in different physical contexts
  • Study the role of ε0 (vacuum permittivity) in electromagnetic interactions
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying electromagnetism, as well as educators looking to enhance their teaching materials on dipole interactions.

physconomic
Messages
15
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
We consider two dipoles p1 and p2 and take r to be the position vector of p2
measured from p1.

Find Uint (interaction energy)

Draw graphs showing how Uint depends upon the relative orientation of the dipoles
in the following cases:
(i) p1 is parallel to r,
(ii) p1 is perpendicular to r.
Relevant Equations
U = -p.E
UInt = 1/(4*pi*epsilon0*r^3)*[p1.p2-3(p1.r^)(p2.r^)]
Draw graphs showing how interaction energy depends upon the relative orientation of two dipoles
if
(i) p1 is parallel to r,
(ii) p1 is perpendicular to r.

I've done the first part and found the interaction energy as
UInt = 1/(4*pi*epsilon0*r^3)*[p1.p2-3(p1.r^)(p2.r^)]
which I know is correct.

I know for the perpendicular case the dot product of p1 and r would be 0 - but I'm not sure what the graph would look like.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello @physconomic , :welcome: !

Apparently your dipoles are electric dipoles :wink: ?

physconomic said:
which I know is correct
How so ?

For the first part, I would expect to see a graph for ##U(\theta)##, or at least the expression; I see no ##\theta ## ?

UInt = 1/(4*pi*epsilon0*r^3)*[p1.p2-3(p1.r^)(p2.r^)]
is hard to read. Perhaps you want to learn some ##\LaTeX## ?

$$U_\text{int}= {1\over 4\pi\varepsilon_0 r_{ij}^3}\Biggl[ \vec p_i\cdot\vec p_j - 3{(\vec p_i\cdot\vec r_{ij})(\vec r_{ij}\cdot\vec p_j) \over r_{ij}^2}\Biggr ]$$ is a lot easier on the eyes.

For the second part:
Well, what did you find for ##U ## ?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz, etotheipi and Delta2

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
19
Views
3K