I Interference by reflection on a CD

Click For Summary
A focused beam of light on a CD creates a visible interference pattern, indicating sufficient spatial coherence. This coherence is similar to that seen in lens-focused beams from LEDs or sunlight filtering through a window. Diffused light can still produce color separation, as observed with CDs, soap bubbles, or oil stains, but it lacks the sharp projection seen with coherent light sources. Coherence must be defined carefully, particularly regarding phase uniformity for specific colors traveling different paths. Ultimately, while diffuse sources can show color variations, they do not project them as sharply as point sources.
MaxLinus
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Interference by reflection on a CD implies coherence?
A fairly focused beam of light incident on a CD projects a clearly visible interference pattern onto a screen.
May I infer that it has good (or at least enough) spatial coherence?
This property is evident, for example, in a lens-focused beam of light produced by a LED or by a ray of sunlight that filters directly through a half-closed window.
Nonetheless, less intense colour separation can be seen even when diffused light reflects on the CD (or soap bubbles, or oil stains on a rainy day). Would a completely non-coherent light produce such patterns?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Addendum. Found a partial answer in this paper: Coherence properties of different light sources and their effect on the image sharpness and speckle of holographic displays
 
One must be very careful to define what one means by coherence. In this case one is interested in the phase uniformity for a particular color of light traveling the multiple paths from source to detector required for interference. The CD is a figured mirror. The path of light onto the CD then into your pupil is limited both by the size of your pupil and the characteristics of the source. Your eye will see colors from a diffuse source. A point source will produce colors that project onto a wall. But a diffuse source will not project colors onto the wall.
 
Thread 'Why higher speeds need more power if backward force is the same?'
Power = Force v Speed Power of my horse = 104kgx9.81m/s^2 x 0.732m/s = 1HP =746W Force/tension in rope stay the same if horse run at 0.73m/s or at 15m/s, so why then horse need to be more powerfull to pull at higher speed even if backward force at him(rope tension) stay the same? I understand that if I increase weight, it is hrader for horse to pull at higher speed because now is backward force increased, but don't understand why is harder to pull at higher speed if weight(backward force)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
6K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
678
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K