I Interference - two waves of different frequencies - beat velocity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the phenomenon of beats created by two overlapping waves of different frequencies and their interference along the z-axis. The author questions the modulation speed of the interference pattern, noting that it can exceed the speed of light (c) depending on the angle θ. Key points include the distinction between modulation speed, which is not limited by c, and the physical movement of particles, which is constrained by light speed. The conversation also touches on the implications of placing a particle within the interference pattern and how it might behave under varying modulation speeds. Ultimately, the author acknowledges a need to clarify their understanding of the forces acting on particles in optical tweezers.
LmdL
Messages
72
Reaction score
1
Hello,
I'm considering the "beats" phenomena. I have two plane waves in some medium with a refractive index n(ω), one propagates in a z direction and second in a direction making an angle θ with z axis. Waves have frequencies ω1, ω2 (not necessarily equal) and k-vectors k1, k2 (not necessarily equal):

pic.png


Now, I'm interested in interference (in the area where both waves overlap) along the z axis direction. I can write the initial fields contributions along the z axis as
p1.png

So their sum is
p2.png

First cosine is the envelope modulation and second is the carrier wave. Now, my question is regarding the modulation speed. As far as I understand, the above describes the beats phenomena. Or, alternatively, an interference pattern with a period of 2π/Δk that moves in time. If I'm right, the modulation speed reads
p3.png

And here is the question: this speed can exceed c (speed of light), once I change the θ. For some θ I can even get an infinite vm (when denominator vanishes). On the other hand, modulation speed should be limited by the speed of light. What I'm missing here?
The possibilities that I thought of:
1. This modulation speed is a sinusoidal and cannot transfer any information, thus isn't limited by c.
2. The expression for vm is correct, but for values of θ that lead to vm>c it should be constrained vm=c .
3. The expression for vm is an expression for phase velocity and I should use d(Δω)/d(Δk) instead (group velocity). However, in this case I also get velocities that exceed c (checked numerically).

Any advice or thoughts are appreciated.
Thank you.
 
Science news on Phys.org
The modulation speed need not be limited by c because it is not the speed of a particle or wave. It is the speed of a feature in a pattern, which is an abstract, non-physical concept, and hence not limited by the speed of light.
As another example of how this can happen, consider a powerful, perfect laser mounted perpendicularly on an axle in the middle of a sphere with radius one light second and pointing directly at the sphere's inner surface. The laser rotates on the axle at a rate of one full rotation per 3 seconds, so that the dot of light it makes on the sphere's inner surface traverses a full equatorial circle of the sphere in that time - distance covered = 2 pi light seconds - more than twice the speed of light. Yet the laser itself is only moving quite slowly. This can happen because the only thing moving on the sphere's inner surface is a feature in a pattern - not a physical thing limited by c.
 
Thank you for your reply. I got your point. I have an additional question: let's suppose I place a particle on the z axis (in the waves overlapping area) and restrict it to move along z axis, for example by adding two transparent parallel to z axis plates, one slightly above it and one slightly below. Particle is then confined to one of the modulation wave maxima (similar to optical tweezers). What will happen now? I suppose that if vm is below c, the particle will move with that speed along the z axis, being in the area of the modulation maximum it was confined to from the beginning. What if vm>c? Particle will "slip" to the next maximum to the left, and then again, and again, and so forth? Is this correct?
 
Why would the particle move at all? What force are you expecting to act on the particle to accelerate it out of a stationary state?
 
Never mind. I need to review my understading of optical tweezers. Thank you for your help!
 
After my surgery this year, gas remained in my eye for a while. The light air bubbles appeared to sink to the bottom, and I realized that the brain was processing the information to invert the up/down/left/right image transferred to the retina. I have a question about optics and ophthalmology. Does the inversion of the image transferred to the retina depend on the position of the intraocular focal point of the lens of the eye? For example, in people with farsightedness, the focal point is...
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
Back
Top