Intermediate variable chain rule question.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on applying the multivariable chain rule to demonstrate the relationship between partial derivatives in Cartesian coordinates (x, y) and polar coordinates (r, θ). The equation to prove is (\frac{\partial w}{\partial x})^2 + (\frac{\partial w}{\partial y})^2 =(\frac{\partial w}{\partial r})^2 + \frac{1}{r^2} (\frac{\partial w}{\partial \theta})^2. The solution involves using the chain rule to express \frac{\partial w}{\partial r} and \frac{\partial w}{\partial \theta} in terms of \frac{\partial w}{\partial x} and \frac{\partial w}{\partial y}. The confusion arises from the notation used for the function w, which can represent different forms depending on the coordinate system.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of multivariable calculus
  • Familiarity with partial derivatives
  • Knowledge of the chain rule in calculus
  • Basic concepts of polar coordinates
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the multivariable chain rule in different coordinate systems
  • Learn how to compute partial derivatives in polar coordinates
  • Practice problems involving transformations between Cartesian and polar coordinates
  • Explore advanced topics in multivariable calculus, such as gradient and divergence
USEFUL FOR

Students studying multivariable calculus, educators teaching calculus concepts, and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of the chain rule and coordinate transformations.

v0id19
Messages
47
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose that w=f(x,y), x=r*cos(θ), y=r*sin(θ). Show that:
[tex](\frac{\partial w}{\partial x})^2 + (\frac{\partial w}{\partial y})^2 =(\frac{\partial w}{\partial r})^2 + \frac{1}{r^2} (\frac{\partial w}{\partial \theta})^2[/tex]


Homework Equations


the multivariable chain rule


The Attempt at a Solution


we just were taught this yesterday, but my prof didn't exactly do a good job, and I'm doing a good job at figuring it out and understanding it, but all I'm able to do is use the chain rule with respect to the independent variables (r and θ in this case), and i can't figure out how to use it for the intermediate variables x and y and my book doesn't have any examples of this. I'm sure it's something really obvious that I'm missing, but i just haven't had that lightbulb moment...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
w depends on x and y

x depends on r and theta; y depends on r and theta

If r changes, then x and y are influenced, and each of them influences w, so the formula for [tex]\frac{\partial w}{\partial r}[/tex] will have to include x and y.

This helps you remember that the formula is
[tex]\frac{\partial w}{\partial r}=\frac{\partial w}{\partial x}\frac{\partial x}{\partial r}+\frac{\partial w}{\partial y}\frac{\partial y}{\partial r}[/tex]

The intuition and formula for [tex]\frac{\partial w}{\partial \theta}[/tex] are similar.

--


Now turning to your problem, on the left hand side, there is nothing to do. [tex]\frac{\partial w}{\partial x}[/tex] and [tex]\frac{\partial w}{\partial y}[/tex] do not simplify.

On the right hand side, use
[tex]\frac{\partial w}{\partial r}=\frac{\partial w}{\partial x}\frac{\partial x}{\partial r}+\frac{\partial w}{\partial y}\frac{\partial y}{\partial r}[/tex]
and the analogous formula for [tex]\frac{\partial w}{\partial \theta}[/tex], find the partials with respect to r and theta, and simplify.
 
Part of the confusion in this type of problem stems from the abuse of notation whereby the same notation, in this case w is used for the function whether it is expressed in terms of x and y or r and theta. To more properly phrase the question it should be given as follows:

If [tex]w(x,y) = W(r,\theta)[/tex], where [tex]x = r\cos(\theta)\, y = r \sin(\theta)[/tex], show that

[tex]w_{x}^2 + w_{y}^2 = W_r^2+\frac 1 {r^2}W_{\theta}^2[/tex]

Now start with the right side and use the chain rule in this form:

[tex]W_r = w_r = w_x x_r + w_y y_r[/tex]

[tex]W_{\theta} = w_{\theta} = w_x x_{\theta} + w_y y_{\theta}[/tex]

The partials [tex]x_r,\ y_r,\ x_{\theta},\ y_{\theta}[/tex] are easy to calculate from your equations. Manipulate that a bit and you should get the required equation.

Once you have done this a couple of times, it likely won't confuse you to use the lower case w for W. Although they aren't the same function, many texts do this.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K