Internal Resistance in a Battery

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving the potential difference across a battery with and without internal resistance, given a series circuit with three resistors. The resistances are specified, and a current through one of the resistors is provided.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of the problem's wording, questioning whether the same current applies in both scenarios and whether the EMF of the battery remains constant. There is also a discussion about the validity of the calculated potential differences.

Discussion Status

Some participants have raised concerns about the vagueness of the problem statement, particularly regarding the assumptions about current and EMF. There is an acknowledgment of differing interpretations, but no explicit consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the lack of information regarding the EMF of the battery and whether the same current flows in both cases, which may affect the calculations of potential difference.

mattbeatlefreak
Messages
34
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Three resistors are connected in series to a battery. The resistances are R1 = 15 Ω ,R2 = 25 Ω , and R3 = 30 Ω and the current through the 15-Ω, resistor is 2.7 A .

What is the potential difference across the battery terminals if the battery is ideal?

What is the potential difference across the battery terminals if the battery has an internal resistance of 5.0 Ω?

Homework Equations


V=iR

Vbatt = ξ*[R/(Rbatt+R)] (this equation was derived in my textbook from Vbatt = ξ - iRbatt)

The Attempt at a Solution


This problem is very straightforward. The total resistance for the first part is just the sum of the resistors since they are in parallel. Solving for the potential difference across the battery I get 189 V; this answer was accepted as correct.

However, when I use the next equation, I get 176.4 V for the second part. Neither 176 or 177 volts (177 in the case that you round 189 to 190) was accepted.
I even checked my answer with this website simulation thing http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/dcex6.html

I feel confident that this is the correct answer, but it is not being accepted. Any thoughts on why? Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sounds a bit like a trick question to me. Note that you are not given the EMF of the battery.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mattbeatlefreak
The problem statement is a bit vague: It doesn't specify whether the same current, 2.7 A, is measured through the 15 Ω resistor in both cases. It also doesn't claim that the emf of the battery is the same in both cases, or if the second case involves a different battery altogether not just the addition of another resistance.

What voltage would you measure across the battery terminals if the current was the same in both cases?Edit: Ah. I see that Doc Al got in there before me.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mattbeatlefreak
gneill said:
The problem statement is a bit vague: It doesn't specify whether the same current, 2.7 A, is measured through the 15 Ω resistor in both cases. It also doesn't claim that the emf of the battery is the same in both cases, or if the second case involves a different battery altogether not just the addition of another resistance.

What voltage would you measure across the battery terminals if the current was the same in both cases?

I assumed that they were talking about the same battery since they reference it as "the" battery in both questions. Thanks for the tip, got the right answer now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K