Interpretation of dx as the differential of x for Indefinite Integrals

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the interpretation of "dx" in the context of indefinite integrals, specifically how it can represent both "with respect to x" and the "differential of x." Participants clarify that integrating f(x)dx yields the same antiderivative F(x) + C regardless of whether "dx" is viewed as a differential or as a variable of integration. The conversation emphasizes that "dx" signifies an infinitely small change in x, and integrating with respect to x or interpreting it as a differential leads to the same mathematical outcome. The concept of area under the curve is also highlighted, reinforcing the geometric interpretation of integrals.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of indefinite integrals and antiderivatives
  • Familiarity with differential calculus concepts
  • Knowledge of substitution techniques in integration
  • Basic grasp of geometric interpretations of integrals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of "differential forms" in calculus
  • Explore the relationship between differentiation and antidifferentiation
  • Learn about the geometric interpretation of integrals and areas under curves
  • Investigate advanced integration techniques, such as u-substitution and integration by parts
USEFUL FOR

Students of calculus, mathematics educators, and anyone seeking a deeper understanding of the concepts surrounding indefinite integrals and differentials.

mbarile
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Interpretation of "dx" as the differential of x for Indefinite Integrals

This question is concept-as-opposed-to-calculation based. I understand that when one sees the integral sign, followed by f(x)dx, that we can think of this as the indefinite integral, or antiderivative of f(x), with "respect to x," where the "dx" means just that ("with respect to x"). Or, we can think of the same expression as being in differential form, where "dx" no longer means "with respect to x," but now is interpreted as the "differential of x," a concept that becomes a useful tool when dealing with substitution techniques and the like. What I'm missing, in terms of understanding, is the following: Say that we integrate f(x)dx, where we think of "dx" as "with respect to x," and we get the function F(x) + C, where C is an arbitrary constant. The idea of the differential form, or at least my understanding of it, is that if we integrate f(x)dx, where "dx" is the "differential of x", we get the same antiderivative, F(x) (+ an arbitrary constant C). How is this so? If we think of "dx" as the "differential of x," is that not some quantity anywhere between (-infinity,infinity)? Are we not then multiplying f(x) by some quantity "dx" by this interpretation, as opposed to the interpretation that "dx" simply means
"with respect to x".

I understand how to manipulate the material to get the correct answer, such as using u-substitution, etc, but the concept does not sit well, so I am obviously missing something. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


to say the antiderivative of f is F, means that dF/dx = f. To say that f(x)dx is the differential of F, means that dF = f(x) dx, which is basically the same thing.
 


Thank you for the response. As a follow up, so are you saying that in the same way that antidifferentiation "undoes" the process of finding the derivative of a function F(x), antidifferentiation will undo the process of finding the differential of a function F(x), and in either case will lead one back to the original function F(x) (plus constant)?
 


Both interpretations are one and the same thing.


Integrals give you area.
When we multiply f(x) with dx we are infact finding the area of small rectangle of breadth dx and height f(x).
When we add all these small areas(which is why we integrate to add these up.Remember integral is a sum.Right?) we get area below the curve.

Now dx has only one meaning.It is an infinitely small change in x.

When we say f(x)d(x) the only imterpretation is that f(x) is multiplied by infinitely small value d(x).


The point which you stated with respect to x is something else.

Imagine a function y =x^2 + t^3

Here y is a function in two independent variables x and t.

Taking a derivative of y with respect to x here means that we see the change in y for an infinitely small change in variable x.

Since y =x^2+t^3

dy/dx =2x + 3t^2 dt/dx

In case t is completely independent of x , (has no relation with it at all) then dt/dx is 0 and dy/dx is just 2x.

If however you want to see how y changes with t, you take a derivative wrt to t to get dy/dt =3t^2 (remember dx/dt is 0 as they both are unrelated i.e independent variables).


This just means that if we increase x from x to dx (keeping t constant) , the effect on y depends on factor 2x.
It is called change in y wrt x.

If however we increase t from t to t+dt(x is constant)
change in y wrt to t depends upon the factor 3t^2.


While integrating its the same meaning.

In essence is you wanted to integrate the above function you had two choices.

To see its area wrt either x or t.
That is the significance of integrating wrt x.


If you wish to find integral of y wrt x, you multiply y with infinitely small change in x which is dx(and assume t to be constant as it doesn't vary with x).
This gives u small rectangle whose breadth is dx and height is y and you obtain area of y wrt x by adding all these small x's .

For indefenite integral you find a general function of area.
 
Last edited:


Search for "differential forms"
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K