Interpretation of Negative Time in Minkowski Diagram

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the interpretation of negative time in a Minkowski diagram, specifically regarding the worldlines of a space station and a spacecraft. The confusion arises from how event B can be considered to have occurred in the past for the spacecraft while both clocks were synchronized at zero when their origins coincided. It is clarified that the ordering of spacelike-separated events does not have consequences, meaning different frames can perceive the timing of events differently without affecting causality. This highlights a key distinction from pre-relativistic theories, where the order of events within light cones is universally agreed upon. Ultimately, the relativity of simultaneity allows for varying perceptions of event timing across different frames.
techsingularity2042
Messages
20
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
A spacecraft is moving at a speed v = 0.8 c with respect to a space station whose proper length is 500 m. Two light bulbs A and B are placed at each end of the station.

The frames are such that when clocks in both frames show zero, the origins of the two frames coincide.

In the frame of reference of the station, the two light bulbs are turned on simultaneously.
According to an observer in the spacecraft, which light bulb is turned on first and what is the time interval between the two lights turning on?
Relevant Equations
Lorentz transformation
I want to explain my thoughts longer, but since my English is terrible, I will try to keep it as short as possible.

JPEG image-4326-97AE-AF-0.jpeg


This is the Minkowski diagram for the question above. ct-axis is the worldline of the space station, and ct'-axis is the worldline of the spacecraft.
What I am confused about is how ct' of B is negative.

How could it have happened in the past in the frame of the spacecraft if it occurred when t=0 if both their clocks have been set to zero when their origins coincide? Doesn't that mean before their origins even coincided, the event B already happened in the frame of the spacecraft, whereas in the station's frame, it occurs when their origins coincide?

Thank you in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
techsingularity2042 said:
Doesn't that mean before their origins even coincided, the event B already happened in the frame of the spacecraft, whereas in the station's frame, it occurs when their origins coincide?
Yes. But there is no consequence to the ordering of spacelike-separated events. If you pick a person and a time on their wristwatch, all frames will agree whether he can see any lamp lit, although if he can't see both they may disagree about whether either is lit.

This is a major difference from pre-relativistic theories. If one event is in the future lightcone of the other, their order is agreed by all frames. If neither event is in the future lightcone of the other, some frames will say they happened in one order, some in the other order, and some at the same time.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes techsingularity2042
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top