Interpretation of Negative Time in Minkowski Diagram

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the interpretation of negative time in Minkowski diagrams, specifically regarding the ct-axis of a space station and the ct'-axis of a spacecraft. The confusion arises from the observation that event B appears to occur in the past for the spacecraft frame when both clocks are synchronized at zero. It is established that the ordering of spacelike-separated events does not have consequences, as different frames may disagree on the sequence of events outside of each other's light cones. This highlights a fundamental distinction from pre-relativistic theories, where event order is universally agreed upon when within the light cone.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Minkowski diagrams
  • Familiarity with spacetime concepts in special relativity
  • Knowledge of light cones and their implications
  • Basic grasp of event ordering in relativistic physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of spacelike and timelike intervals in special relativity
  • Explore the concept of light cones in greater detail
  • Learn about the Lorentz transformations and their effects on event ordering
  • Investigate the differences between relativistic and classical physics regarding event sequences
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying special relativity, as well as educators seeking to explain complex concepts related to spacetime and event ordering.

techsingularity2042
Messages
20
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
A spacecraft is moving at a speed v = 0.8 c with respect to a space station whose proper length is 500 m. Two light bulbs A and B are placed at each end of the station.

The frames are such that when clocks in both frames show zero, the origins of the two frames coincide.

In the frame of reference of the station, the two light bulbs are turned on simultaneously.
According to an observer in the spacecraft, which light bulb is turned on first and what is the time interval between the two lights turning on?
Relevant Equations
Lorentz transformation
I want to explain my thoughts longer, but since my English is terrible, I will try to keep it as short as possible.

JPEG image-4326-97AE-AF-0.jpeg


This is the Minkowski diagram for the question above. ct-axis is the worldline of the space station, and ct'-axis is the worldline of the spacecraft.
What I am confused about is how ct' of B is negative.

How could it have happened in the past in the frame of the spacecraft if it occurred when t=0 if both their clocks have been set to zero when their origins coincide? Doesn't that mean before their origins even coincided, the event B already happened in the frame of the spacecraft, whereas in the station's frame, it occurs when their origins coincide?

Thank you in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
techsingularity2042 said:
Doesn't that mean before their origins even coincided, the event B already happened in the frame of the spacecraft, whereas in the station's frame, it occurs when their origins coincide?
Yes. But there is no consequence to the ordering of spacelike-separated events. If you pick a person and a time on their wristwatch, all frames will agree whether he can see any lamp lit, although if he can't see both they may disagree about whether either is lit.

This is a major difference from pre-relativistic theories. If one event is in the future lightcone of the other, their order is agreed by all frames. If neither event is in the future lightcone of the other, some frames will say they happened in one order, some in the other order, and some at the same time.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: techsingularity2042

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
731
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K