Interpretation of QM that psiontic, local, and has collapse?

In summary, interpretations in quantum mechanics refer to the different ways in which physicists and philosophers try to understand and explain the theory. The psiontic interpretation suggests a connection between observer and observed, while the local interpretation assumes no such connection. The collapse of the wavefunction is explained differently in each interpretation. Currently, there is no experimental evidence to support either interpretation. Some attempts have been made to reconcile or combine the two interpretations, but no unified understanding has been widely accepted. The debate and discussion among physicists on this topic continues.
  • #1
Nickyv2423
46
3
Is there any interpretation of QM that is Psi-ontic, local, and has wave function collapse?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
No. Ontic wave function collapse is necessarily non-local.
 

1. What is the meaning of "interpretation" in the context of quantum mechanics?

In quantum mechanics, interpretation refers to the various ways in which physicists and philosophers attempt to understand and explain the mathematical formalism and experimental observations of quantum theory. These interpretations often involve different conceptual frameworks and assumptions about the nature of reality.

2. What is the difference between the psiontic and local interpretations of quantum mechanics?

The psiontic interpretation posits that there is a fundamental connection between the observer and the observed, and that consciousness plays a role in the collapse of the quantum wavefunction. On the other hand, the local interpretation assumes that there is no such connection and that all physical processes follow local, deterministic laws.

3. How does the collapse of the wavefunction occur in these interpretations?

In the psiontic interpretation, the collapse of the wavefunction is thought to be triggered by the conscious observation of a quantum system. In the local interpretation, the collapse is explained by the presence of hidden variables or by the interaction of the system with its environment.

4. Do these interpretations have any experimental evidence to support them?

Currently, there is no experimental evidence that conclusively supports one interpretation over the other. The predictions of quantum mechanics have been confirmed by numerous experiments, but the interpretations themselves are still a subject of debate and discussion among physicists.

5. Can these interpretations be reconciled or combined?

Some physicists have attempted to combine elements of both the psiontic and local interpretations in order to create a more comprehensive understanding of quantum mechanics. However, these attempts have not yet resulted in a widely accepted unified interpretation, and the debate continues.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
29
Views
924
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
2
Replies
37
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
4
Replies
119
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
4
Replies
109
Views
7K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
2
Replies
43
Views
588
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
3
Replies
84
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
2
Replies
41
Views
3K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
2
Replies
44
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
9
Replies
309
Views
7K
Back
Top