Interpreting a double integral as volume

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation of the double integral of the function F(x,y) = 4x^2y^3 over the disk defined by x^2 + y^2 = 1, specifically addressing whether the integral evaluates to zero. Participants explore the implications of the function's symmetry properties in relation to the integral's value.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how the function F(x,y) can be zero over the disk, suggesting that its oddness in y might be a factor.
  • Another participant clarifies that while F(x,y) is even with respect to x, it is odd with respect to y, which leads to cancellation in the y direction.
  • A later reply asserts that the integral is indeed zero, providing a calculation of the double integral and emphasizing that the oddness in one variable suffices for the entire integral to be zero.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the implications of the function's symmetry and whether the integral can be considered zero.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is disagreement regarding whether the double integral evaluates to zero. Some participants assert it is zero based on symmetry arguments, while others question this conclusion and seek clarification.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes varying interpretations of symmetry and its effects on the integral's value, with some participants providing calculations while others remain uncertain about the reasoning involved.

naggy
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
The function F(x,y) = 4x^2y^3 over the disk x^2 + y^2 =1 is supposed to be zero over the disk. I'm wondering how you can see it?

I cannot see this or imagine it in 3D. Is it because the function is odd in terms of y?

F(x,-y) = -F(x,y) ? independent of wheher x is positive or negative?

Because functions like G(x,y) = y^3 is obviously odd and so the double integral would be zero over the same disk, but I have an extra x^2 term. How is one supposed to think this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The fact that it's even with respect to the x variable just means that it is symetrical about x = 0 along any line parallel to the x-axis, but it is odd with respect to the y variable so the canceling out of the area occurs along the y direction only...
 
BackEMF said:
The fact that it's even with respect to the x variable just means that it is symetrical about x = 0 along any line parallel to the x-axis, but it is odd with respect to the y variable so the canceling out of the area occurs along the y direction only...

So the integral (volume) is not zero?
 
It is zero. Have you calculated double integrals yet? If you integrate over any line parallel to the y-axis using symmetric limits, so x stays constant, you see that the integral is zero:

[tex]\int_{-1}^{1}4x^2 y^3 dy[/tex]
(Note that x is treated as a constant here, since it doesn't vary along a line parallel to the y-axis)

[tex]4x^2\int_{-1}^{1}y^3 dy[/tex]

[tex]4x^2 \left[y^4/4\right]_{-1}^{1}[/tex]

[tex]4x^2 [1/4-1/4] = 4x^2 . 0 = 0[/tex]

i.e. once the function is odd with respect to one variable that is enough for the whole thing to be zero (once your limits symmetric) because once that intergral is zero, the whole double integral (or triple integral or whatever) must be zero. Does this makes sense?
 
BackEMF said:
It is zero. Have you calculated double integrals yet? If you integrate over any line parallel to the y-axis using symmetric limits, so x stays constant, you see that the integral is zero:

[tex]\int_{-1}^{1}4x^2 y^3 dy[/tex]
(Note that x is treated as a constant here, since it doesn't vary along a line parallel to the y-axis)

[tex]4x^2\int_{-1}^{1}y^3 dy[/tex]

[tex]4x^2 \left[y^4/4\right]_{-1}^{1}[/tex]

[tex]4x^2 [1/4-1/4] = 4x^2 . 0 = 0[/tex]

i.e. once the function is odd with respect to one variable that is enough for the whole thing to be zero (once your limits symmetric) because once that intergral is zero, the whole double integral (or triple integral or whatever) must be zero. Does this makes sense?

Yup. thx
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K