Intersection of a sequence of intervals equals a point

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the proof that the intersection of a sequence of intervals, defined as A_{n} = [a_{n}, b_{n}], converges to a single point p in the real numbers R. The intervals are defined such that A_{n} > A_{n+1} and the length |b_{n} - a_{n}| approaches 0. By applying the Monotonic Convergent Theorem, it is established that both limits lim_{n→∞} a_{n} and lim_{n→∞} b_{n} exist, leading to the conclusion that β = α, thus proving that the intersection is indeed a single point, represented as {p}.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of real number sequences and limits
  • Familiarity with the Monotonic Convergent Theorem
  • Knowledge of interval notation and properties
  • Basic concepts of bounded sequences
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Monotonic Convergent Theorem in detail
  • Explore examples of bounded sequences and their limits
  • Learn about the properties of real number intervals
  • Investigate the implications of convergence in mathematical analysis
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying real analysis, and anyone interested in the properties of sequences and limits in mathematical contexts.

The Captain
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Intersection of a sequence of intervals equals a point (Analysis)

Homework Statement


Let A[itex]_{n}[/itex] = [a[itex]_{n}[/itex], b[itex]_{n}[/itex]] be a sequence of intervals s.t. A[itex]_{n}[/itex]>A[itex]_{n+1}[/itex] and |b[itex]_{n}[/itex]-a[itex]_{n}[/itex]|[itex]\rightarrow[/itex]0. Then [itex]\cap^{∞}_{n=1}[/itex]A[itex]_{n}[/itex]={p} for some p[itex]\in[/itex]R.

Homework Equations


Monotonic Convergent Theorem
If {a[itex]_{n}[/itex]} is a sequence of real numbers, then this sequence has a finite limit if and only if the sequence is bounded.

R = Real Numbers
N = Natural Numbers

The Attempt at a Solution


Since [a[itex]_{m}[/itex], b[itex]_{m}[/itex]]≤[a[itex]_{n}[/itex],b[itex]_{n}[/itex] for n≤m, then a[itex]_{n}[/itex]≤a[itex]_{m}[/itex] for n≤m and implies {a[itex]_{n}[/itex]}, n[itex]\in[/itex]N is monotonically nondecreasing.

Since a[itex]_{m}[/itex]≤b[itex]_{m}[/itex] and a[itex]_{n}[/itex]≤b[itex]_{n}[/itex], then a[itex]_{i}[/itex]≤b[itex]_{j}[/itex] for i,j[itex]\in[/itex]N. And {b[itex]_{j}[/itex]} is monotonically nonincreasing and bounded below [itex]\forall[/itex]a[itex]_{i}[/itex],i[itex]\in[/itex]N.

Then by Monotonic Convergent Theorem, lim[itex]_{n\rightarrow∞}[/itex]{a[itex]_{n}[/itex]} and lim[itex]_{n\rightarrow∞}[/itex]{b[itex]_{n}[/itex]} exist. Also, lim[itex]_{n\rightarrow∞}[/itex]{a[itex]_{n}[/itex]}=sup(a[itex]_{n}[/itex]}) = α and lim[itex]_{n\rightarrow∞}[/itex]{b[itex]_{n}[/itex]}=inf(b[itex]_{n}[/itex]}) = β.

Then since α=sup(a[itex]_{n}[/itex]), α≤b[itex]_{n}[/itex], n[itex]\in[/itex]N, β=inf(b[itex]_{n}[/itex]), α≤β, this implies that [α,β]≠0. Since a[itex]_{n}[/itex]≤α≤β≤b[itex]_{n}[/itex], then [α,β][itex]\subset[/itex][a[itex]_{n}[/itex], b[itex]_{n}[/itex]]. This implies [itex]\cap^{∞}_{n=1}[/itex]=[α,β].

Then lim[itex]_{n\rightarrow∞}[/itex](b[itex]_{n}[/itex]-a[itex]_{n}[/itex])=0. This implies lim[itex]_{n\rightarrow∞}[/itex](b[itex]_{n}[/itex])-lim[itex]_{n\rightarrow∞}[/itex](a[itex]_{n}[/itex])=0. This implies β-α=0, implies β=α.

Then [α,β] = {α} = {β}, implies [α,β] = {p} for some p[itex]\in[/itex]R.
∴ [itex]\cap^{∞}_{n=1}[/itex]A[itex]_{n}[/itex]={p} for some p[itex]\in[/itex]R.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


The Captain said:

Homework Statement


Let A[itex]_{n}[/itex] = [a[itex]_{n}[/itex], b[itex]_{n}[/itex]] be a sequence of intervals s.t. A[itex]_{n}[/itex]>A[itex]_{n+1}[/itex] and |b[itex]_{n}[/itex]-a[itex]_{n}[/itex]|[itex]\rightarrow[/itex]0. Then [itex]\cap^{∞}_{n=1}[/itex]A[itex]_{n}[/itex]={p} for some p[itex]\in[/itex]R.

Homework Equations


Monotonic Convergent Theorem
If {a[itex]_{n}[/itex]} is a sequence of real numbers, then this sequence has a finite limit if and only if the sequence is bounded.

R = Real Numbers
N = Natural Numbers

The Attempt at a Solution


Since [a[itex]_{m}[/itex], b[itex]_{m}[/itex]]≤[a[itex]_{n}[/itex],b[itex]_{n}[/itex] for n≤m, then a[itex]_{n}[/itex]≤a[itex]_{m}[/itex] for n≤m and implies {a[itex]_{n}[/itex]}, n[itex]\in[/itex]N is monotonically nondecreasing.

Since a[itex]_{m}[/itex]≤b[itex]_{m}[/itex] and a[itex]_{n}[/itex]≤b[itex]_{n}[/itex], then a[itex]_{i}[/itex]≤b[itex]_{j}[/itex] for i,j[itex]\in[/itex]N. And {b[itex]_{j}[/itex]} is monotonically nonincreasing and bounded below [itex]\forall[/itex]a[itex]_{i}[/itex],i[itex]\in[/itex]N.

Then by Monotonic Convergent Theorem, lim[itex]_{n\rightarrow∞}[/itex]{a[itex]_{n}[/itex]} and lim[itex]_{n\rightarrow∞}[/itex]{b[itex]_{n}[/itex]} exist. Also, lim[itex]_{n\rightarrow∞}[/itex]{a[itex]_{n}[/itex]}=sup(a[itex]_{n}[/itex]}) = α and lim[itex]_{n\rightarrow∞}[/itex]{b[itex]_{n}[/itex]}=inf(b[itex]_{n}[/itex]}) = β.
OK up to here, I think.
Then since α=sup(a[itex]_{n}[/itex]), α≤b[itex]_{n}[/itex], n[itex]\in[/itex]N, β=inf(b[itex]_{n}[/itex]), α≤β, this implies that [α,β]≠0. Since a[itex]_{n}[/itex]≤α≤β≤b[itex]_{n}[/itex], then [α,β][itex]\subset[/itex][a[itex]_{n}[/itex], b[itex]_{n}[/itex]]. This implies [itex]\cap^{∞}_{n=1}[/itex]=[α,β].
I'm not sure how you concluded that last bit. All this demonstrates is that [itex][\alpha,\beta] \subset \cap_{n=1}^{\infty}[a_n,b_n][/itex].
Then lim[itex]_{n\rightarrow∞}[/itex](b[itex]_{n}[/itex]-a[itex]_{n}[/itex])=0. This implies lim[itex]_{n\rightarrow∞}[/itex](b[itex]_{n}[/itex])-lim[itex]_{n\rightarrow∞}[/itex](a[itex]_{n}[/itex])=0. This implies β-α=0, implies β=α.

Then [α,β] = {α} = {β}, implies [α,β] = {p} for some p[itex]\in[/itex]R.
∴ [itex]\cap^{∞}_{n=1}[/itex]A[itex]_{n}[/itex]={p} for some p[itex]\in[/itex]R.
I think you have all the necessary ingredients for the proof, but it is more cluttered than it needs to be. It suffices to prove the following two statements:

1. The intersection is non-empty. For example, it contains [itex]\sup a_n[/itex]. You have already proved this.

2. The intersection cannot contain more than one point. For suppose it contained two distinct points [itex]x[/itex] and [itex]y[/itex]. Then there is some nonzero distance between them: [itex]|x - y| = d > 0[/itex]. Use the fact that [itex]b_n - a_n \rightarrow 0[/itex] to show that this cannot happen.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K