Intersection points of two lines in two-space

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the intersection point of two lines represented by their parametric equations. To find the intersection, the position vectors of both lines must be equal, leading to a system of equations based on their x and y coordinates. Participants suggest using substitution to solve for the parameters s and t, emphasizing that both must yield the same t value for a specific s. The expected intersection point is given as (1.5, 5), prompting further exploration of the equations derived from the parametric forms. The conversation highlights the importance of setting the derived equations equal to each other to find the correct values for s and t.
adrimare
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that the following pairs of lines intersect. Determine the coordinates of the point of intersection.

L1: r= (-3,-1) + t(3,4)

L2: r= (6,2) + s(3,-2)

Homework Equations



?

The Attempt at a Solution



I know that eventually the two lines will reach the same point at which they will intersect, but I'm not really sure how to get to that point. The x and y of L1 has to equal the x and y of L2, right? Do I have to use the direction vectors somehow or guess and check?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
adrimare said:
. The x and y of L1 has to equal the x and y of L2, right?

Right.:approve:

You can combine those into a single equation very easily. You are given an expression for the position vector of any point an both lines. At the point point of intersection, those position vectors must be the same (otherwise they represent different points). That means, that for some specific values of s and t, you must have

(-3,-1)+t(3,4)=(6,2)+s(3,-2)[/itex] <br /> <br /> Solve that equation for s and t.
 
How would you solve for that, though? I have made them into parametric equations and tried to solve so that both x's and y's have the same s and t values. But there are two variables. Without guess and check, how can I solve for these values? The answer is supposed to be (1.5,5) according to the answer section of the book.
 
Each component gives you an equation, so you will have two equations and two unknowns. Solving that system of equations is something you should have learned how to do in High School algebra.
 
Am I wrong in using parametric equations? So far, I have tried the substitution method because I can't think of another way to do it. For the x-value of the first line,
I got -3 + 3t = 6 + 3s.
I simplified to get t = (9 + 3s)/3, which turns into t = 3 + s. I went to the y-value of the first line. This has to have the same t-value as the x-value, right? I got -1 + 4t = 2- 2s, which turns into 4t = 3 - 2s, which becomes t = (3-2s)/4. The t-values are not the same. Did I do something wrong or am I completely off track here?
 
adrimare said:
The t-values are not the same.

They will be the same for a specific value of s...set them equal to each other and solve for that value.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K