Intro QM: Add a constant to the Potential, Effect on Wave Function?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the effect of adding a constant potential energy, Vo, to a particle's potential energy in quantum mechanics. The original poster attempts to show that this addition introduces a time-dependent phase factor, e^{-iV_ot/\hbar}, and explores the implications for the Schrödinger equation. After some initial confusion regarding notation and equations, it is clarified that the modified Schrödinger equation should indeed reflect the addition of the constant potential as iħ(dΨ/dt) = (-ħ²/2m)(d²Ψ/dx²) + (V + V0)Ψ. The final consensus confirms that the solution is valid, demonstrating that the added potential does not alter the fundamental structure of the equation. This highlights the importance of careful notation and understanding in quantum mechanics.
dotman
Messages
127
Reaction score
0
Hi, I've got a problem with the following problem. This is 1.8 out of Griffiths QM text, and was previously covered on this forum for another user in https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=152775", although that thread doesn't address my problem.

1. Suppose a constant potential energy,Vo, independent of x and t is added to a particle's potential energy. Show that this adds a time-dependent phase factor, e^{-iV_ot/\hbar}.

My attempt at the solution was, as stated in the other thread, to sub in \psi(x,t) e^{-iV_0 t/\hbar} and see if that solves the schrodinger eqn with the constant potential V0 added in:

i\hbar\frac{d\Psi}{dt} = \frac{-\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{d^2\Psi}{dx^2} + V(x)\Psi

\psi=\psi e^{-iV_{0}t/\hbar}

\Rightarrow\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial t}=\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial t}e^{-iV_{0}t/\hbar}-\frac{iV_{0}}{\hbar}\psi e^{-iV_{0}t/\hbar}

\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial x}=\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial x}e^{-iV_{0}t/\hbar}

\frac{\partial^{2}\psi}{\partial x^{2}}=\frac{\partial^{2}\psi}{\partial x^{2}}e^{-iV_{0}t/\hbar}

i\hbar\left[\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial t}e^{-iV_{0}t/\hbar}-\frac{iV_{0}}{\hbar}\psi e^{-iV_{0}t/\hbar}\right]=\frac{-\hbar^{2}}{2m}\frac{\partial^{2}\psi}{\partial x^{2}}e^{-iV_{0}t/\hbar}+V\psi e^{-iV_{0}t/\hbar}

\Rightarrow i\hbar\left[-\frac{iV_{0}}{\hbar}\psi e^{-iV_{0}t/\hbar}\right]+i\hbar\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial t}e^{-iV_{0}t/\hbar}=\frac{-\hbar^{2}}{2m}\frac{\partial^{2}\psi}{\partial x^{2}}e^{-iV_{0}t/\hbar}+V\psi e^{-iV_{0}t/\hbar}

\Rightarrow i\hbar\left[-\frac{iV_{0}}{\hbar}\psi\right]+i\hbar\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial t}=\frac{-\hbar^{2}}{2m}\frac{\partial^{2}\psi}{\partial x^{2}}+V\psi

\Rightarrow-\frac{i^{2}V_{0}\hbar}{\hbar}\psi+i\hbar\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial t}=\frac{-\hbar^{2}}{2m}\frac{\partial^{2}\psi}{\partial x^{2}}+V\psi

\Rightarrow V_{0}\psi+i\hbar\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial t}=\frac{-\hbar^{2}}{2m}\frac{\partial^{2}\psi}{\partial x^{2}}+V\psi

\Rightarrow i\hbar\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial t}=\frac{-\hbar^{2}}{2m}\frac{\partial^{2}\psi}{\partial x^{2}}+V\psi-V_{0}\psi

\Rightarrow i\hbar\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial t}=\frac{-\hbar^{2}}{2m}\frac{\partial^{2}\psi}{\partial x^{2}}+\left(V-V_{0}\right)\psi

But we're supposed to have added the constant potential in, so it should look like:

i\hbar\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial t}=\frac{-\hbar^{2}}{2m}\frac{\partial^{2}\psi}{\partial x^{2}}+\left(V+V_{0}\right)\psi

Have I made a mistake somewhere? Am I doing this wrong? Any help or advice would be appreciated.

Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
dotman said:
\psi=\psi e^{-iV_{0}t/\hbar}

Ermm.. isn't this kind of like saying 2=2e^{-iV_{0}t/\hbar}?...Use two different variables to differentiate the wave function with the added constant potential from the wave function without the added constant potential (I'd recommend using \Psi(x,t) and \psi(x,t) respectively)...

What is the Schroedinger equation for \Psi(x,t)? What is the Schroedinger equation for \psi(x,t)?
 
Ok, well, yeah, that's bad notation. But notational issues aside, though, I don't see how this changes my result.

"Normal" Schrodinger equation:

i\hbar\frac{d\psi}{dt} = \frac{-\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{d^2\psi}{dx^2} + V\psi

Schrodinger equation with the added potential factor:

i\hbar\frac{d\Psi}{dt} = \frac{-\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{d^2\Psi}{dx^2} + V(x)\Psi

where \Psi=\psi e^{-iV_0t/\hbar}

And using the partial derivatives \frac{\partial\Psi}{\partial t}, etc, of this, the rest of my result is the same:

i\hbar\frac{d\Psi}{dt} = \frac{-\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{d^2\Psi}{dx^2} + V(x)\Psi \Rightarrow i\hbar\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial t}=\frac{-\hbar^{2}}{2m}\frac{\partial^{2}\psi}{\partial x^{2}}+\left(V-V_{0}\right)\psi<br />

What am I missing?
 
Oh wait, I see it now.

That second eqn should be:

i\hbar\frac{d\Psi}{dt} = \frac{-\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{d^2\Psi}{dx^2} + (V+V_0)\Psi<br />

And so it reduces to the original equation, thus showing that it is, in fact a solution of the Schrodinger equation with the added potential.

Look right?
 
dotman said:
Oh wait, I see it now.

That second eqn should be:

i\hbar\frac{d\Psi}{dt} = \frac{-\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{d^2\Psi}{dx^2} + (V+V_0)\Psi<br />

And so it reduces to the original equation, thus showing that it is, in fact a solution of the Schrodinger equation with the added potential.

Look right?

Yup, exactly!:smile:
 
Thanks for the help gabba!
 
(a) The polarisation pattern is elliptical with maximum (1,1) and minimum (-1,-1), and anticlockwise in direction. (b) I know the solution is a quarter-wave plate oriented π/4, and half-wave plate at π/16, but don't understand how to reach there. I've obtained the polarisation vector (cos π/8, isin π/8) so far. I can't find much online guidance or textbook material working through this topic, so I'd appreciate any help I can get. Also, if anyone could let me know where I can get more...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
95
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K