Invariance of energy under change of origin

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the invariance of energy measurements when changing the origin of a coordinate system for a particle in an energy eigenstate. Participants explore the implications of translating the wavefunction and the Hamiltonian, particularly in the context of quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states that for an observer in a translated coordinate frame, the wavefunction appears as ψ'(x) = ψ(x+K), and questions how to prove that the energy measured remains the same.
  • Another participant presents an integral expression for the expected energy and suggests that it holds under the transformation of coordinates.
  • A different viewpoint mentions that the presence of a potential could introduce non-physical factors in the wavefunction, which are mitigated when calculating probability densities.
  • One participant expresses confusion regarding the notation of the Hamiltonian as H(x) and questions whether proving equality of expected energy values implies that ψ'(x) is also an energy eigenvector.
  • Another participant suggests that the Hamiltonian may need to be "shifted" in accordance with the translation of the wavefunction, referencing the chain rule as potentially useful.
  • A participant outlines two scenarios regarding the translation of the wavefunction and potential, indicating that only under certain conditions does the system exhibit symmetry, which affects energy measurements.
  • One participant reiterates the integral expression for expected energy as a valid approach to the problem.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of translating the wavefunction and the Hamiltonian, with some uncertainty about the conditions under which energy invariance holds. No consensus is reached regarding the necessity of shifting the Hamiltonian or the implications of the energy eigenstate property.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions about the notation and meaning of H(x) as an operator, as well as the implications of potential shifts on energy measurements. The discussion also reflects varying interpretations of symmetry in quantum systems.

cdog1350
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Suppose you have a particle in one dimension in an energy eigenstate, i.e. Hψ(x)=Eψ(x) for some E. For an observer B in a coordinate frame with the origin translated some distance K to the right, the wavefunction of the particle looks like ψ'(x) = ψ(x+K).

Surely, we expect the energy that B measures to be the same as you measure, so Hψ'(x) = Eψ'(x) or in other words Hψ(x+K) = Eψ(x+K). But how can we prove this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
<E> = ∫ψ*(x) H(x) ψ(x) dx = ∫ψ*(x') H(x') ψ(x') dx' where x' = x + k.
 
If you have a potential, it will produce some non physical factor in psi, which gets killed off by it's conjugate when we turn psi into a probability density function
 
Bill_K said:
<E> = ∫ψ*(x) H(x) ψ(x) dx = ∫ψ*(x') H(x') ψ(x') dx' where x' = x + k.

I'm not sure I understand this notation. The hamiltonian H is an operator, i.e. it's a functional that takes a function f(x) to some other function f'(x). I can see how it can be dependent on time like H(t) - that just means that the way it takes f(x) to f'(x) changes with time. But what does H(x) mean?

Also, even if you've proved the above result for <E>, that just says that the energy expectation values of ψ(x) and ψ'(x) are equal. Does that necessarily prove that ψ'(x) is an energy eigenvector with energy E?
 
I am too busy to do the calculation, but I have a few thoughts.

Doesn't the Hamiltonian also have to be "shifted"? For example, consider a harmonic oscillator.

The chain rule might help.

Your example is a particular case of something much more general.
 
usually

[tex]H(x) = -\partial_x^2 + V(x)[/tex]

If you translate x to x+k in the wave function, then you have two options

1.)
[tex]x \to x+k[/tex]
[tex]dx \to dx[/tex]
[tex]\partial_x \to \partial_x[/tex]
[tex]\psi(x) \to \psi(x+k)[/tex]
[tex]V(x) \to V(x+k)[/tex]
Then obviously this is a symmetry of the system and nothing changes

2.)
[tex]\psi(x) \to \psi(x+k)[/tex]
[tex]V(x) \to V(x)[/tex]
Then usually this is not a symmetry of the system; it corresponds to
[tex]\psi(x) \to \psi(x)[/tex]
[tex]V(x) \to V(x-k)[/tex]
and that means that you translate the oparticle w/o translating the potential, so the energy will change (only in the trivial case V(x) = V = const this is a symmetry)
 
Bill_K said:
<E> = ∫ψ*(x) H(x) ψ(x) dx = ∫ψ*(x') H(x') ψ(x') dx' where x' = x + k.

that is the nice way of doing it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K