Inverse Efficiency Matrix (error)

In summary, the conversation discusses the determination of the efficiency matrix ##M_{eff}## in an experiment involving ##Z^0## particles. The matrix relates the number of detected particles to the number of real particles, with some uncertainty in its elements. The question is how to find the error in the elements of the inverse matrix ##M_{eff}^{-1}##. One approach suggested is to create different matrices with elements in the range allowed by ##M_{eff} \pm \delta M_{eff}## and take the mean value, but this may be unreliable. Another approach is to rely on Monte Carlo simulations to directly determine the inverse matrix and its uncertainties. Another suggestion is to generate many random matrices, taking into account correlations
  • #1

ChrisVer

Gold Member
3,378
464
Hi, let's say in some experiment with ##Z^0## (eg LEP) you are able to determine the "misidentification" of your particles.
Then you can find the efficiency matrix ##M_{eff}## which is given (for ##Z^0## decays to leptons or hadrons):

[itex] \begin{pmatrix} N_e \\ N_\mu \\ N_\tau \\ N_{had} \end{pmatrix}_{detect} = M_{eff} \begin{pmatrix} N_e \\ N_\mu \\ N_\tau \\ N_{had} \end{pmatrix}_{real} \Rightarrow \vec{N}_{det} = M_{eff} \vec{N}_{real} [/itex]

With some errors in its elements, so in general you measure ##M_{eff} \pm \delta M_{eff}##.

My question is then, since I want to find what is actually my real measured events for the decay products:

[itex] \vec{N}_{real} = M_{eff}^{-1} \vec{N}_{det}[/itex]

How can you find the error in the elements of [itex]M_{eff}^{-1}[/itex]?

One example I thought of is quite primitive, and in general very untrustworthy, for example get [itex]M_{eff}+\delta M_{eff}[/itex] find its inverse, and do the same for [itex]M_{eff} - \delta M_{eff}[/itex]. Then I know how much (in the worst case scenario the elements will diverge from the mean valued [itex]M_{eff}^{-1}[/itex].

I find it more plausible to create different matrices [itex] A_i[/itex] which have as elements different values in the range allowed from [itex]M_{eff} \pm \delta M_{eff}[/itex], take their inverse [itex]A_i^{-1}[/itex] and then mean value it and find its statistical error.
However with a ##4 \times 4## matrix (or 16 elements) I don't know how many [itex]A_i[/itex]'s can give a trustworthy result...any help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
ChrisVer said:
One example I thought of is quite primitive, and in general very untrustworthy, for example get [itex]M_{eff}+\delta M_{eff}[/itex] find its inverse, and do the same for [itex]M_{eff} - \delta M_{eff}[/itex]. Then I know how much (in the worst case scenario the elements will diverge from the mean valued [itex]M_{eff}^{-1}[/itex].
Those are matrices with 16 elements, so you have 16 different uncertainties. To make it worse, they are correlated. Adding the positive value to all won't work.
If you rely on Monte Carlo for your matrix, you can directly determine the inverse matrix so your statistics tool gives the uncertainties.

Generating many random matrices looks like a possible approach. As many as you need for the precision you are interested in. The more correlations you take into account the harder it gets.
 

What is an Inverse Efficiency Matrix?

An Inverse Efficiency Matrix (IEM) is a mathematical tool used in signal processing and data analysis to estimate the error in a measurement or calculation. It is derived from the inverse of the covariance matrix and is often used in regression analysis and model fitting.

Why is an Inverse Efficiency Matrix important?

The IEM allows researchers to quantify the error in their data and take it into consideration when making conclusions or predictions. It also helps identify outliers or errors in the data and can improve the accuracy of statistical analyses.

How is an Inverse Efficiency Matrix calculated?

The IEM is calculated by taking the inverse of the covariance matrix of the data. This is typically done using computer software or programming languages such as MATLAB or Python. The resulting matrix can then be used to calculate the error on individual data points or to assess the overall error in a dataset.

What is the relationship between an Inverse Efficiency Matrix and a covariance matrix?

The IEM is derived from the inverse of the covariance matrix, which measures the relationships between variables in a dataset. The IEM is specifically used to quantify the error in these relationships, making it a useful tool for understanding the accuracy of data and statistical analyses.

Can an Inverse Efficiency Matrix be used to correct for measurement error?

No, an IEM cannot be used to correct for measurement error. It can only estimate the error in a measurement or calculation. To correct for measurement error, researchers may need to use other techniques such as data transformation or error modeling.

Suggested for: Inverse Efficiency Matrix (error)

Replies
22
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
757
Replies
2
Views
973
Replies
1
Views
968
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top