Inverse Laplace Transform Help

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on evaluating the inverse Laplace transform of the expression L^{-1}(F(s)/(s + a)). It is established that the ability to compute this transform depends on the function F(s); specifically, if F has no singularities, the inverse transform can be expressed using a residue calculation. Alternatively, convolution can be applied, where if f(t) = L^{-1}[F(s)](t), then L^{-1}(F(s)/(s + a))(t) can be computed through an integral involving f and an exponential decay term. The conversation emphasizes that without knowing F(s), it is impossible to evaluate the expression accurately. Understanding the nature of F(s) is crucial for determining the correct inverse transform.
GreenPrint
Messages
1,186
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Is there a way to evaluate L^{-1}(\frac{F(s)}{s + a})? I'm sure if it can be evaluate.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
GreenPrint said:

Homework Statement



Is there a way to evaluate L^{-1}(\frac{F(s)}{s + a})? I'm sure if it can be evaluate.

It depends on what F is. If F has no singularities then the inverse transform
<br /> \mathcal{L}^{-1}\left(\frac{F(s)}{s + a}\right) = \frac{1}{2\pi i}\int_{c-i\infty}^{c + i\infty} \frac{F(s)e^{st}}{s+a}\,ds<br />
(where c \in \mathbb{R} is such that there are no singularities of F(s)/(s+a) to the right of the line \mathrm{Re}(s) = c) reduces to the residue of \dfrac{F(s)e^{st}}{s+a} at s = -a, which is F(-a)e^{-at}.
 
GreenPrint said:

Homework Statement



Is there a way to evaluate L^{-1}(\frac{F(s)}{s + a})? I'm sure if it can be evaluate.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Use convolution: if
f(t) = L^{-1}[F(s)](t),
then
L^{-1} \left( \frac{F(s)}{s+a} \right) (t) = \int_0^t f(t-\tau) e^{-a \tau} \, d \tau.
 
So if you have no idea what one of the functions in the frequency domain is and you get something like

inverse Laplace transform( F(s)G(s) )

and you know what G(s) of is but F(s) is not given then you have no way to evaluate the expression?
 
GreenPrint said:
So if you have no idea what one of the functions in the frequency domain is and you get something like

inverse Laplace transform( F(s)G(s) )

and you know what G(s) of is but F(s) is not given then you have no way to evaluate the expression?

Of course. If I give you two different F(s), you will get two different answers.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K