Inverse Laplace Transform: Solve Homework Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter polarmystery
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse Laplace
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the inverse Laplace transform of a complex function involving constants a, R, C, and L. Participants are attempting to navigate the intricacies of the transformation process and the manipulation of the function.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss breaking down the function into smaller parts for easier handling. There are questions about completing the square and how to adjust the numerator accordingly. Some suggest using the exponential shifting theorem as a potential approach.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants sharing their attempts and methods. Some guidance has been offered regarding simplifying the problem and using known theorems, but there is no explicit consensus on the best approach yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about their foundational knowledge and the complexity of the problem, indicating a need for clarification on certain mathematical techniques involved in the inverse Laplace transform.

polarmystery
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the inverse laplace transform of the equation listed:

(\frac{1-e^{-sa}}{a})*(\frac{1}{s^2}-\frac{RC}{s}+\frac{sRC+R^2\frac{C}{L}-1}{s^2+s\frac{R}{L}+\frac{1}{LC}})


Homework Equations



a, R, C, and L are constants.


The Attempt at a Solution



Completely lost, not sure how to even begin to reduce this massive function.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
polarmystery;3548372Completely lost said:
You can start by starting small then building back up. First consider:

(1-e^{-s})(\frac{1}{s^2}-\frac{1}{s}+\frac{s+k}{s^2+s+c})

You can do that one right? Just break it up into individual pieces and compute the inverse transform of each piece. Get that working, then start adding all those constants. Won't change it much right since they're just constants.
 
If I complete the square term on the bottom (s^2 + s + c) => (s + x)^2 + c, where does the additional x^2 term go that I added? Does it get added to the numerator also? It's been a while since I've done this stuff before.
 
So you want to transform:

\frac{s+k}{s^2+s+c}

I'd have to review that also but as far as completing the square, you'd write:

s^2+s+c=s^2+s+1/4-1/4+c=(s+1/2)^2+c-1/4

or to make it a little easier, just let f=c-1/4 so that we need to invert now:

\frac{s+k}{(s+1/2)^2+f}

Yeah, well I don't know how to do that one either. I'd have to review. I did it in Mathematica and it looks pretty messy but the more you work on these, the easier they get.
 
Well, after completing the square and then subtracting out what I added to complete the square, I get this (It's a bit messy):

\frac{RC(s+\frac{R}{L}-1)}{(s+\frac{R}{2L})^2-\frac{R^2C^2-4LC}{4L^2C^2}}
 
Ok, that's a good start although you're quick to jump right back to the complicated problem. So Let me work a simple one that's related using the exponential shifting theorem:

Suppose I have:

\frac{s+k}{(s+1/2)^2+f}

I now write that as:

\frac{(s+1/2)+(k-1/2)}{(s+1/2)^2+f}

Now we can use the shifting theorem:

L^{-1}\{f(s-a)\}=e^{at}F(t)

where F(t) is the inverse transform of f(s).

You can figure that out.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K