Inverse of a Piecewise Function

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the inverse of a piecewise function and addresses the challenges of doing so without an explicit formula. Participants suggest listing ordered pairs of the function to help visualize the inverse. For the floor function, it is noted that it is not one-to-one, thus lacking an inverse, while the second function, f(x) = x/(1-x^2), is analyzed for its one-to-one nature within a specified interval. Ultimately, it is concluded that the correct branch of the quadratic formula must be chosen to ensure the function maintains its one-to-one property. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding function behavior to determine valid inverses.
SpringPhysics
Messages
104
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the inverse of
...{x...x =/= a1,...,an
f(x) = {ai+1...x = ai, i = 1,...,n-1
...{a1...x = an

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I interchanged the variables x and y, but I am very confused as to how to solve for the rest. I don't understand how to find inverses if we aren't given an explicit formula. Can someone help please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
SpringPhysics said:

Homework Statement


Find the inverse of
...{x...x =/= a1,...,an
f(x) = {ai+1...x = ai, i = 1,...,n-1
...{a1...x = an

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I interchanged the variables x and y, but I am very confused as to how to solve for the rest. I don't understand how to find inverses if we aren't given an explicit formula. Can someone help please?

It might help you to just list the ordered pairs for f. Then reverse them all and you should see a way to write f-1 as a formula similar in form to the formula for f(x).
 
LCKurtz said:
It might help you to just list the ordered pairs for f. Then reverse them all and you should see a way to write f-1 as a formula similar in form to the formula for f(x).

All right. Thanks for your help.

Also, could I ask for help on finding inverses for the following?

f(x) = x + [x] (floor) and f(x) = x/(1-x2) for -1 < x < 1.

For the first function, there is no reversible equation for the floor operator, so could I state the inverse as simply {(x+[x],x) | (x,x+[x]) \in f}?
Would it be possible to state that any x in f be a.b, where a is an integer and b is any real number?
Then
f(x) = a.b + a for a >= 0 and
f(x) = a.b + (a-1) for a < 0.
Then the inverse of f would be given by
f-1(x) = 1/2 (x + 0.b) for x >= 0 and
f-1(x) = 1/2 (x + 1.b - 0.(2b)) for x < 0.

For the second function, I interchanged the variables and obtains:
x(1-y2) = y
0 = xy2 + y - x
Using the quadratic formula, I got
y = (-1 +/- \sqrt{1+4x^2})/2x, -1 < y < 1
How do I know whether to take the positive or negative?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You shouldn't take either one. If your calculations are correct, you are saying that this function is NOT one to one and so does NOT have an inverse.
 
HallsofIvy said:
You shouldn't take either one. If your calculations are correct, you are saying that this function is NOT one to one and so does NOT have an inverse.

I am not sure which function you are referring to, but for the second function, the question asked to determine f-1 (the inverse) for -1 < x < 1. Hence, the function is 1-1 for the specified interval. I am just not sure there is an intuitive reason why the positive root works but not the negative.

The floor function is not 1-1 so it does not have an inverse, but the question is f(x) = x + floor (x), so that the function is 1-1. However, I am not sure how to cleanly express its inverse.

EDIT: Never mind for the floor function. Can someone please explain the first function?
 
Last edited:
SpringPhysics said:
EDIT: Never mind for the floor function. Can someone please explain the first function?

Are you talking about f(x) = x + [x]?

Try drawing the graph of f-1. You will see that its domain has gaps and the segments of the graph are translates of f(x) = x. Does that help?
 
LCKurtz said:
Are you talking about f(x) = x + [x]?

Try drawing the graph of f-1. You will see that its domain has gaps and the segments of the graph are translates of f(x) = x. Does that help?

Sorry, I meant f(x) = x/(1-x2)
 
When you interchanged x and y and solved for y you got:

y = \frac {-1 \pm \sqrt{1+4x^2}}{2x}

One way you can tell you don't want the - choice is what happens as x approaches 0. The branch you want goes through the origin. If you look at

y = \frac {-1 - \sqrt{1+4x^2}}{2x}

as x\rightarrow 0 you get a -2/0 form which indicates a vertical asymptote.

On the other hand if you let x\rightarrow 0 in

y = \frac {-1 + \sqrt{1+4x^2}}{2x}

you get 0 as you can see if you rationalize the numerator and take the limit.

Another thing that is a bit more work is to observe that with the + choice you get -1\le y \le 1, which also tells you you have the right branch.
 
I see now. Thank you so much for your help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K